Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #81547

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

Path csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel
Subject Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Date Sat, 13 Jan 2024 04:50:01 +0100
Message-ID <HVCSB-2Iqp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <HVsqd-2C7o-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <HVtFD-2CMv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <HVu8F-2Dcd-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-release@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-release-request@lists.debian.org Sat Jan 13 03:45:13 2024
Old-Return-Path <rhys@neoquasar.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-4.768 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, GMAIL=1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.26, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -4.6
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.300.61.1.2\))
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Mailer Apple Mail (2.3774.300.61.1.2)
X-Mailing-List <debian-release@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/160759
List-ID <debian-release.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/E63A4CBD-B1C0-432A-984F-D4E73D19464B@neoquasar.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 14
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Fri, 12 Jan 2024 21:26:42 -0600
X-Original-Message-ID <E63A4CBD-B1C0-432A-984F-D4E73D19464B@neoquasar.org>
X-Original-References <CAKcpw6XEyc5rAymQC7vSP0uYpMEF7+7_AQagGSP-PyVkJcZ3FA@mail.gmail.com> <3j9uo37e3n2idcoa7mhi91uc.1705080990975@email.android.com> <CAOh3dDbDvUyW8L+jj4pm5gEHqnStK96b-tUYji6B+hv8_OLYjA@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.devel.release:122046 linux.debian.kernel:81547 linux.debian.devel:110261

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Let me try again, following up on the previous thread, but removing most of the irrelevant history.

If I have a 32-bit Intel system that is currently supported on bookworm (currently running bullseye, but I can upgrade it), is that of use to anyone as a native build platform for 32-bit binary packages for Debian?

--J

> On Jan 12, 2024, at 12:06, Alan Corey <alan01346@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Are you forgetting that 64 bit is slower?  In the arm world where it's easily switchable 64 bit is pokey when you don't need it.
>

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 10:50 +0100
  Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-11 10:50 +0100
    Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 11:50 +0100
      Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 12:50 +0100
        Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 18:40 +0100
          Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2024-01-13 19:50 +0100
      Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-01-11 17:10 +0100
        Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> - 2024-01-12 17:20 +0100
          Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Alan Corey <alan01346@gmail.com> - 2024-01-12 19:30 +0100
            Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 04:50 +0100
              Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> - 2024-01-13 04:50 +0100
                Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 14:20 +0100
                Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> - 2024-01-13 17:00 +0100
                Re: Offer to make a native 32-bit system avaiable rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 20:20 +0100
                Re: Offer to make a native 32-bit system avaiable Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-13 21:10 +0100
              Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 14:30 +0100
    Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-12 23:40 +0100
      Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-13 17:40 +0100
        Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-13 18:00 +0100
  Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 11:50 +0100
  gcc displaying bullshit allocation numbers? (was: Re: Ability to  further support 32bit architectures) Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-13 18:00 +0100

csiph-web