Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure

From	Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.devel, linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject	Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure
Date	2023-07-21 13:10 +0200
Message-ID	<GTWbf-1J8e-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<GTWbf-1J8e-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <GTG6t-1z5m-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <GTU9r-1HIa-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <GTW1z-1IPn-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Le vendredi 21 juillet 2023, 10:52:17 UTC Bastien Roucariès a écrit :
> Le vendredi 21 juillet 2023, 08:55:39 UTC Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> > efs
> https://pypi.org/project/qnxmount/ claim to mount it. Check
> > hfs
> https://github.com/0x09/hfsfuse
Corrected not supported by this package may be emulated by using user space hfs tools ?
> > hfaplus
> https://github.com/0x09/hfsfuse
> > qnx6
> Fuse ro filesystem https://pypi.org/project/qnxmount/ better support then kernel one
> > sysv
> no fuse equivalent may be easier to port from (net)?bsd source to fuse or use the method of qnxmount
> > 
> > affs
> no fuse equivalent but a grub filesystem may be ported to fuse
> > ecryptfs
> no fuse equivalent
> > jffs2
> no fuse equivalent
> > jfs
> no fuse equivalent but a grub filesystem may be ported to fuse
> > 
> > And I think that I can also safely add a few more which while actively 
> > maintained I believe are only used in a retrocomputing context or are 
> > generally uncommon anyway:
> > 
> > befs
> A fuse module seems to be avalaible https://www.haiku-os.org/guides/daily-tasks/access_bfs_with_fuse/
> > bfs
> no fuse equivalent
> > hpfs
> no fuse
> > omfs
> https://github.com/bcopeland/omfs_fuse/
> > qnx4
> Maybe Fuse ro filesystem https://pypi.org/project/qnxmount/
> > reiserfs
> so incomplete work using grub filesystem https://github.com/albertz/reiserfs-fuse
> > spu
> This one is a virtual fs for powerpc should be dropped of the list
> > ufs
> https://github.com/mkatiyar/fuse-ufs2
> > 
> 
>

Thread

Bug#1041552: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2023-07-20 20:10 +0200
  Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2023-07-21 11:00 +0200
    Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Magissia <debianlist@magissia.com> - 2023-07-21 11:10 +0200
    Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> - 2023-07-21 12:10 +0200
    Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2023-07-21 13:00 +0200
      Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2023-07-21 13:10 +0200
    Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> - 2023-07-21 19:40 +0200
      Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2023-07-23 02:40 +0200
  Processed: Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2023-08-27 02:40 +0200
  Bug#1041552: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2023-08-27 02:40 +0200

csiph-web