Re: Debian Kernel version and ABI in respect of #1040901

Path	csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.in-chemnitz.de!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!news.servidellagleba.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel.release
Subject	Re: Debian Kernel version and ABI in respect of #1040901
Date	Mon, 17 Jul 2023 12:10:01 +0200
Message-ID	<GStkZ-PFT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<GRakp-V0-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <GRbq9-1C6-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org Mon Jul 17 10:00:11 2023
Old-Return-Path	<waldi@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-105.521 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SHIPPING_ID=3, SHIP_ID_INT=1, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Mail-Followup-To	debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition	inline
X-Mailing-List	<debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/139140
List-ID	<debian-kernel.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20230717094223.nuzhkaywkvixa565@shell.thinkmo.de
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	27
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Mon, 17 Jul 2023 11:42:23 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<20230717094223.nuzhkaywkvixa565@shell.thinkmo.de>
X-Original-References	<20230713191615.s5hmzixwkfkmeqig@shell.thinkmo.de> <ZLBeb1lYWEToYRL3@localhost>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.kernel:79630 linux.debian.devel.release:117989

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 11:28:31PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 09:16:15PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > ### NMU
> > Can be easily added back by adding "bX" or so to the ABI.
> That would be confusing, bX is naming convention for binNMUs in Debian 
> revisions.

Right.

> > ### BinNMU
> > 
> > Is impossible to support.  The version change requires changes in the
> > names of the created packages.
> >...
> It should only be impossible to make them co-installable,
> or what other reason requires a rename?

The contents are incompatible.  We can of course completely remove the
ability to load modules after a kernel upgrade and then install
everything into "linux-image-amd64".

Bastian

-- 
Deflector shields just came on, Captain.

Thread

Debian Kernel version and ABI in respect of #1040901 Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2023-07-13 21:40 +0200
  Re: Debian Kernel version and ABI in respect of #1040901 Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2023-07-13 22:50 +0200
    Re: Debian Kernel version and ABI in respect of #1040901 Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2023-07-17 12:10 +0200
  Re: Debian Kernel version and ABI in respect of #1040901 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2023-07-14 16:20 +0200
    Re: Debian Kernel version and ABI in respect of #1040901 Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2023-07-17 12:10 +0200
  Re: Debian Kernel version and ABI in respect of #1040901 Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2023-07-23 10:10 +0200
    Re: Debian Kernel version and ABI in respect of #1040901 Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2023-07-24 22:00 +0200
      Re: Debian Kernel version and ABI in respect of #1040901 Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2023-09-03 11:40 +0200
    Re: Debian Kernel version and ABI in respect of #1040901 Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2023-09-03 11:40 +0200

csiph-web