Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #77454
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1021391: Possible solution with kernel 6.0.11 |
| Date | 2022-12-05 22:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FzqSR-8Cpr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FziLE-8xlX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <FdUbf-cE37-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FziLE-8xlX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hi Bernhard, On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 12:21:48PM +0000, Bernhard wrote: > Hello Salvatore > > It is possible, that kernel 6.0.11 solves the Bug #1021391 because of > > >>> > - [arm64,armhf] bus: sunxi-rsb: Remove the shutdown callback > - [arm64,armhf] bus: sunxi-rsb: Support atomic transfers > <<< > > If i have a look at the ARM kernel mailinglist, there are bugfixes for this I2C: > > >>> > Shutting down the RSB controller prevents communicating with a PMIC > inside pm_power_off(), so it breaks system poweroff on some boards. > <<< > > >>> > This series fixes a couple of issues that occur when powering off a > board using a PMIC attached to the RSB bus. > > These issues only affected 32-bit platforms, because 64-bit platforms > use PSCI for pm_power_off(), and the PSCI firmware reinitializes the > RSB controller. > <<< > > >>> > When communicating with a PMIC during system poweroff (pm_power_off()), > IRQs are disabled and we are in a RCU read-side critical section, so we > cannot use wait_for_completion_io_timeout(). Instead, poll the status > register for transfer completion. > <<< > > Is it planned, to release this kernel in the next days? > I'm really very interested in testing. I was pondering it actually, and the changes are waiting in the sid branch, but wanted to include the changes of upcoming 6.0.12 as well in the next update. Regards, Salvatore
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1021391: Kernel Exception at BananaPi M2 Ultra Bernhard <bernhard.woerner@posteo.de> - 2022-10-07 14:00 +0200
Bug#1021391: Kernel Exception at BananaPi M2 Ultra Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2022-10-07 15:40 +0200
Processed: Re: Bug#1021391: Kernel Exception at BananaPi M2 Ultra "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2022-10-07 15:40 +0200
Bug#1021391: Possible solution with kernel 6.0.11 Bernhard <bernhard.woerner@posteo.de> - 2022-12-05 13:30 +0100
Bug#1021391: Possible solution with kernel 6.0.11 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-12-05 22:10 +0100
Bug#1021391: Possible solved with kernel 6.0.12 Bernhard <bernhard.woerner@posteo.de> - 2022-12-26 17:40 +0100
Bug#1021391: Possible solved with kernel 6.0.12 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-12-27 09:40 +0100
Bug#1021391: marked as done (Kernel Exception at BananaPi M2 Ultra) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2022-12-30 17:30 +0100
csiph-web