Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #76995
| From | Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1023779: linux: deleting the kernel image package leaves back /lib/modules/<version> when a kernel package was built |
| Date | 2022-11-10 11:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FqcFr-2Kme-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Fq5DX-2FK4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Fq5ND-2FNm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Fq5DX-2FK4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Fq5ND-2FNm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Connecting Knowledge |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On donderdag 10 november 2022 03:42:36 CET Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Thu, 2022-11-10 at 03:37 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > > $ ls -al 6.0.0-3-amd64/build 6.0.0-3-amd64/source > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 calestyo calestyo 36 Nov 5 14:41 6.0.0-3-amd64/build -> > > /usr/src/linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 calestyo calestyo 37 > > Nov 5 14:41 6.0.0-3-amd64/source -> > > /usr/src/linux-headers-6.0.0-3-common > The date of the symlinks is November the 5th, however I built the > custom kernel this night. https://tracker.debian.org/news/1381949/accepted-linux-607-1-source-into-unstable/ Shows that 6.0.0-3 was accepted into Unstable on Nov 5 ... > So there must have been something else that created them (dkms? - at > least not me personally)... or is there some date mangling somewhere > for making reproducible builds? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux does say "Does not build reproducibly" But in the aforemention link you can also see this line: "Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2022 14:41:22 +0100" It _could_ be a coincidence, but I doubt it. So it looks like it's not fully reproducible (yet), but using that date is a step towards it. Getting (back) to the actual subject of the bug report, it seems quite likely that you also have linux-headers-X.Y.Z installed. And IIRC, it needs/creates those 'source' and 'build' dirs/links.
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1023779: linux: deleting the kernel image package leaves back /lib/modules/<version> when a kernel package was built Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.org> - 2022-11-10 03:40 +0100
Bug#1023779: linux: deleting the kernel image package leaves back /lib/modules/<version> when a kernel package was built Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.org> - 2022-11-10 03:50 +0100
Bug#1023779: linux: deleting the kernel image package leaves back /lib/modules/<version> when a kernel package was built Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2022-11-10 11:10 +0100
Bug#1023779: linux: deleting the kernel image package leaves back /lib/modules/<version> when a kernel package was built Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2022-11-10 13:10 +0100
Bug#1023779: linux: deleting the kernel image package leaves back /lib/modules/<version> when a kernel package was built Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.org> - 2022-11-10 14:20 +0100
csiph-web