Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #76780

Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug

From Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug
Date 2022-10-29 00:40 +0200
Message-ID <FlGb7-hopP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <Flgql-h8LU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FlgJI-h8RS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FlpDj-hepN-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <FkVcd-gVcp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FlpDj-hepN-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Hey Salvatore.

On Fri, 2022-10-28 at 06:49 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I did decide to still do so, so we can have the CVE fix migrate
> finally to testing (which took some time as well given there was the
> perl transition ongoing).

Fine for me... I think it would be nice if there was a better mechanism
to have bugs shown in apt-listbugs out of the box, while still not
preventing migration to testing.


Oh and another off-topic thing:

Right now the kernel image meta-packages depend on the (secure boot)
signed version of that... and it seems that these take always longer to
be available than the unsigned ones.

However, if people want the nice service to have linux-image-amd64
installed and pull in just the current package, they need to wait for
the signed one to become available - even if they don't use secure boot
at all.

So question is,.. would it make sense to request that linux-image-amd64
depends on the signed | unsigned version?



> I did import already 6.0.5 and will upload next so we get the btrfs
> fix. And I have made the bug now as well again back RC severity.

Thanks as always for your continued efforts.


Cheers,
Chris.

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.org> - 2022-10-26 22:30 +0200
  Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 22:50 +0200
  Processed: Re: Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2022-10-27 21:10 +0200
  Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-10-27 21:10 +0200
    Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.org> - 2022-10-27 21:30 +0200
      Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-10-28 07:00 +0200
        Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.org> - 2022-10-29 00:40 +0200
          Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-10-29 09:40 +0200
  Processed: Re: Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2022-10-28 07:00 +0200

csiph-web