Bug#970639: ZSWAP still considered experimental?

From	Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Bug#970639: ZSWAP still considered experimental?
Date	2022-06-09 15:50 +0200
Message-ID	<EwqHT-3G0n-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<Et5JD-1wxJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ARaxA-1EC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Etde9-1BvL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ARaxA-1EC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Etde9-1BvL-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Connecting Knowledge

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 18:39:27 CEST Andrew Morton wrote:
> On 31 May 2022 10:41:05 Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> wrote:
> > In https://bugs.debian.org/970639 the request was made to enable ZSWAP.
> > ...
> > Should ZSWAP should still be considered experimental or not?
> 
> I'd say "not".

Even though the Kconfig file still mentions "experimental" in 5.19-rc1,
I consider this response enough proof that it can be enabled.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/log/mm/Kconfig
shows several recent commits for that Kconfig file, including a reorganization.

I (still) do not know what and how exactly ZSWAP should be enabled, but it 
looks like the 5.19 kernel is a good target to enable it and fix this bug?

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#970639: ZSWAP still considered experimental? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2022-06-09 15:50 +0200

csiph-web