Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #73859
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#998716: linux-image-5.14.0-2-amd64: The package size has grown a lot compared to 5.8/5.10 releases |
| Date | 2021-11-30 13:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DpaAp-5MK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <DgFDr-5D0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DoZbX-7oy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Dp209-DD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DgFDr-5D0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Dp209-DD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 05:19 +0200, Горбешко Богдан wrote: > On 30.11.2021 01:57, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > About 59 MiB, so again most of the increase. > > > > It appears that BTF in modules was enabled in Linux 5.11 by > > <https://git.kernel.org/linus/5f9ae91f7c0dbbc4195e2a6c8eedcaeb5b9e4cbb> > > So the patch that was supposed to drastically reduce the size of modules > by extracting the debugging info to a separate deduplicated file, > actually increased it even more? Sounds pretty ironic. > > Or did the deduplication finally make BTFs reasonably small to be > included by default, as they were much larger before and thus were disabled? It is confusing, yes. I *think* that the commit message is actually saying that it makes the module BTF section smaller than in an earlier version that was not applied. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings This sentence contradicts itself - no actually it doesn't.
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#998716: linux-image-5.14.0-2-amd64: The package size has grown a lot compared to 5.8/5.10 releases Bohdan Horbeshko <bodqhrohro@gmail.com> - 2021-11-07 03:00 +0100
Bug#998716: marked as done (linux-image-5.14.0-2-amd64: The package size has grown a lot compared to 5.8/5.10 releases) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-11-12 23:30 +0100
Processed: Re: Bug#998716 closed by Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (Re: Bug#998716: linux-image-5.14.0-2-amd64: The package size has grown a lot compared to 5.8/5.10 releases) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-11-13 09:20 +0100
Bug#998716: closed by Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (Re: Bug#998716: linux-image-5.14.0-2-amd64: The package size has grown a lot compared to 5.8/5.10 releases) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-11-13 09:20 +0100
Bug#998716: linux-image-5.14.0-2-amd64: The package size has grown a lot compared to 5.8/5.10 releases Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2021-11-30 01:30 +0100
Bug#998716: linux-image-5.14.0-2-amd64: The package size has grown a lot compared to 5.8/5.10 releases Горбешко Богдан <bodqhrohro@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 04:30 +0100
Bug#998716: linux-image-5.14.0-2-amd64: The package size has grown a lot compared to 5.8/5.10 releases Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2021-11-30 13:40 +0100
Bug#998716: linux-image-5.14.0-2-amd64: The package size has grown a lot compared to 5.8/5.10 releases Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> - 2021-11-30 11:20 +0100
Bug#998716: linux-image-5.14.0-2-amd64: The package size has grown a lot compared to 5.8/5.10 releases Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2021-11-30 20:30 +0100
Bug#998716: linux-image-5.14.0-2-amd64: The package size has grown a lot compared to 5.8/5.10 releases Fabian Grünbichler <fabian.gruenbichler@student.tuwien.ac.at> - 2021-12-26 17:50 +0100
csiph-web