Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #67635
| From | Sarah Newman <srn@prgmr.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#964494: File system corruption with ext3 + kernel-4.19.0-9-amd64 |
| Date | 2020-07-28 00:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AxjDs-3iS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <At3dT-1RX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <At3dT-1RX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxjDs-3iS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Aq6hX-80m-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxjDs-3iS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 7/20/20 11:24 AM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 20:52:40 -0700 Sarah Newman <srn@prgmr.com> wrote: >> On 7/7/20 8:13 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> Control: reassign -1 src:linux >>> Control: tag -1 moreinfo >>> >>> On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 17:30 -0700, Sarah Newman wrote: >>>> Package: linux-signed-amd64 >>>> Version: 4.19.0-9-amd64 >>>> >>>> We've had two separate reports now of debian buster users running >>>> 4.19.0-9-amd64 who experienced serious file system corruption. >>> >>> Which version? (I.e. what does "uname -v" or >>> "dpkg -s linux-image-4.19.0-9-amd64" say?) >>> >>>> - Both were using ext3 >>>> - Both are running Xen HVM, but I do not have reason to believe this to be related >> >> [...] > > I have servers which run 4.19.118-2 as dom0 kernel and a Xen 4.11.4-1 > rebuild for Buster. > > One example is a smallish 6-server cluster that got a reboot cycle 48 > days ago. > > It contains a few heavily loaded domUs with 4.19.118 or 4.19.131 based > kernels. > > No problems or disk corruption or anything is seen yet. dom0 filesystem > is ext4, domUs use a mix of ext4 and btrfs (over iscsi). So, no ext3 > anywhere. > > We haven't got bug reports against Debian Xen packages in the BTS about > this. > > I have not yet tried to make an ext3 fs on a block device in a test domU > and then have it do things with the fs and reboot it now and then. If > wanted, I can do that and see if there's any problem after a week or > two. Just to add chaos to help correlating. > > FWIW, > Hans > We've had 9 reports of users running 4.19.0-9-amd64 total, only 2 with ext3, no uptimes longer than maybe 5 weeks for the ext3 + 4.19.0-9-amd64 users. No more reported failures. Our attempts to reproduce so far have not been successful, but that might be because we were running a debug kernel build and I think there may have been a deadlock in between depot_lock and console_owner which killed the tests. I'm not sure what the next steps are here, but it sounds like ext4 has not shown any problems. --Sarah
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#964494: File system corruption with ext3 + kernel-4.19.0-9-amd64 Sarah Newman <srn@prgmr.com> - 2020-07-08 02:40 +0200
Processed: Re: Bug#964494: File system corruption with ext3 + kernel-4.19.0-9-amd64 "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2020-07-08 05:20 +0200
Bug#964494: File system corruption with ext3 + kernel-4.19.0-9-amd64 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2020-07-08 05:20 +0200
Bug#964494: File system corruption with ext3 + kernel-4.19.0-9-amd64 Sarah Newman <srn@prgmr.com> - 2020-07-09 00:50 +0200
Bug#964494: File system corruption with ext3 + kernel-4.19.0-9-amd64 Sarah Newman <srn@prgmr.com> - 2020-07-28 00:20 +0200
Bug#964494: Info received (Bug#964494: File system corruption with ext3 + kernel-4.19.0-9-amd64) Sarah Newman <srn@prgmr.com> - 2020-08-19 07:10 +0200
csiph-web