Processed: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Processed: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2
Date	Fri, 05 Jun 2020 08:50:01 +0200
Message-ID	<AeekV-8tp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<AeekV-8tp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AedoR-7Uq-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jun 5 06:48:19 2020
Old-Return-Path	<debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.8 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bugs.debian.org; s=smtpauto.buxtehude; h=Date:References:Message-ID:Subject :CC:To:From:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To; bh=AKLeQ/hsWHCM60KvjsiUg2fKdtsEFssncv8hcepya2Q=; b=I9GbYaCkjLLo+KLtXXHfmb7Ol3 x35xyc6mZFEy8+NeieJ5t2iockIISfuIE2ANi0nWFoDAtdTIO/No/GoBc+bqvrcZbBLxfDc6m0xKg FbxEM4Xk39fmytuwrhAnKuqq7VuHCsqE5IgLlBk7MeFIgEWAUs71XrfzSc643gbcZaRpqPblOP8BY DUewFcDVGHyBIqEewRm9G1LK3a1Mmo8OVqf5pGvQhykFDCRO/YCsPZwtbOjkJa+g3BwUdo+jeODkf 5RdcTTlggNJCbIjWI0huTcAy1KGn6SEFXsgM0NsNwsk2tqSPDIyFe6cb8JMzMv5kfj1a+E52G5BRT Wpc6vXzw==;
Content-Disposition	inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Mailer	MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Debian-Pr-Package	src:linux
X-Debian-Pr-Source	linux
X-Debian-Pr-Message	transcript
X-Mailing-List	<debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/124239
List-ID	<debian-kernel.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/handler.s.B962254.159133947228843.transcript@bugs.debian.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	10
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date	Fri, 05 Jun 2020 06:48:03 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<handler.s.B962254.159133947228843.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
X-Original-References	<20200605064426.GA1538868@eldamar.local> <20200605051607.GA34405@mattapan.m5p.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.kernel:67233

Show key headers only | View raw

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #962254 [src:linux] NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.

-- 
962254: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962254
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Thread

Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2 Elliott Mitchell <ehem+debian@m5p.com> - 2020-06-05 07:50 +0200
  Processed: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2 "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2020-06-05 08:50 +0200
  Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2020-06-05 08:50 +0200
    Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2 Elliott Mitchell <ehem+debian@m5p.com> - 2020-06-05 20:20 +0200
      Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2020-06-05 20:40 +0200
        Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2 Elliott Mitchell <ehem+debian@m5p.com> - 2020-06-06 00:40 +0200
        Bug#934160: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2 Elliott Mitchell <ehem+debian@m5p.com> - 2020-06-09 04:00 +0200
  Processed: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2 "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2020-06-09 04:00 +0200
  Bug#962254: Umask ignored when mounting NFSv4.2 share of an exported ZFS (with acltype=off) (was: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2020-06-13 15:00 +0200
  Bug#962254: Umask ignored when mounting NFSv4.2 share of an exported ZFS (with acltype=off) (was: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2) "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com> - 2020-06-15 17:10 +0200
    Bug#962254: Umask ignored when mounting NFSv4.2 share of an exported Filesystem with noacl (was: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2020-06-15 21:00 +0200
  Bug#962254: Umask ignored when mounting NFSv4.2 share of an exported Filesystem with noacl (was: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2) "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com> - 2020-06-16 04:50 +0200
    Bug#962254: Umask ignored when mounting NFSv4.2 share of an exported Filesystem with noacl (was: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2020-06-16 07:40 +0200
    Bug#962254: Umask ignored when mounting NFSv4.2 share of an exported Filesystem with noacl (was: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2020-06-16 18:30 +0200
      Bug#962254: Umask ignored when mounting NFSv4.2 share of an exported Filesystem with noacl (was: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2) "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com> - 2020-06-17 03:10 +0200
        Bug#962254: Umask ignored when mounting NFSv4.2 share of an exported Filesystem with noacl Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2020-06-17 07:10 +0200
  Bug#962254: Umask ignored when mounting NFSv4.2 share of an exported Filesystem with noacl (was: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2020-06-16 07:40 +0200
  Bug#962254: Umask ignored when mounting NFSv4.2 share of an exported Filesystem with noacl (was: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2) "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com> - 2020-06-17 17:40 +0200
    Bug#962254: Umask ignored when mounting NFSv4.2 share of an exported Filesystem with noacl (was: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2) Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> - 2020-06-17 19:00 +0200

csiph-web