Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #68146

Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns

Path csiph.com!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns
Date Wed, 16 Sep 2020 21:10:02 +0200
Message-ID <APKYy-7UG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <AKs6d-37f-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <APAFP-1DU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <AJ9S1-516-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <APIWJ-6uw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <APKOS-7BX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AJ9S1-516-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <APKOS-7BX-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Wed Sep 16 19:00:08 2020
Old-Return-Path <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag NO
X-Spam-Score -4.2
Reply-To Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org>, 969223@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
X-Debian-Pr-Message followup 969223
X-Debian-Pr-Package src:linux
X-Debian-Pr-Source linux
X-Spam-Bayes score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 141; neutral, 39; spammy, 1. spammytokens:0.976-+--colleagues hammytokens:0.000-+--H*r:TLS1_3, 0.000-+--ubuntu's, 0.000-+--Ubuntu's, 0.000-+--nondebian, 0.000-+--non-debian
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yJEnUSTXTRdFARSw3sVcoFTIf6BkOrpR1w8fzcf3A18=; b=qXGyrAw5b+PzAS8fI1HJAJ7vFxYggYrMPFYiu9NtBI1myR4Y2ROf4n5eRmCoKhCrIf oHMsE0PRqQuxcvV67uN9XNYMVqrcxQ+kKpkPd6RGVISI1GSaxPT49zx8xwVBm2rlP46q 7a0Y2dujijdIheCI4VcXXgSc3FPNaZ82KZNAvah5WecQKMIb8GJfb6nd0KAm19RcUfn/ JY5gfiqwU73qkqViKHnhKrNsGylG93Wqz4IuZrMh7UEvoa1lEL6CCOW7bXS33oh9DymX VsbDUPhn9akBC8Z36ccpmxCvRMio31TRsp29btD1Kzpa749BuudEMXqcgps5fV0mEWDY Rc2A==
X-Gm-Message-State AOAM533SxyyHI8MN3cECAd7F8pqc7OdKyU+AHQ0PIZ2rNedjFBHZV8vZ mspZ9rk00wR1Bh1coFuULqkZSERc0BP07B23
X-Google-SMTP-Source ABdhPJzHzUff3OY/E4YAbxP5aSI8X09yIPmpOYKHgKbfHG+Iab9IZ0Mel1+CpUCy5R3XcTxMwzjv+w==
X-Received by 2002:a1f:1f0d:: with SMTP id f13mr14972684vkf.1.1600282662961; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received by 2002:a67:c799:: with SMTP id t25mr6085150vsk.34.1600282662401; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID <CAFyCLW-9-=kdTbzOwSn71YRDFTH-4Q6s08ejzWJu_tjBmiATJA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Debian-Message from BTS
X-Mailing-List <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1623272
List-ID <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 19
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc 969223@bugs.debian.org
X-Original-Date Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:57:31 +0800
X-Original-Message-ID <CAFyCLW-9-=kdTbzOwSn71YRDFTH-4Q6s08ejzWJu_tjBmiATJA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <CAFyCLW-+iW1aSWxSQOmJGC9+O+HySmb7orazW2AOm8v3i=M=pg@mail.gmail.com> <20200916075317.GQ18520@fjasle.eu> <20200829141322.GA197496@local.zhsj.me> <CAFyCLW-2k5rw+hrXeYGXuFiTERSaiugGCNpu8Pw=r8Low3pLYA@mail.gmail.com> <20200916184647.GS18520@fjasle.eu> <20200829141322.GA197496@local.zhsj.me> <20200916184647.GS18520@fjasle.eu>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1025364 linux.debian.kernel:68146

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 2:52 AM Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> wrote:
>
> > I think I just mess up when debugging. It seems it never works.
> >
> > Maybe we should revert permit_mounts_in_userns? as it doesn't seem to
> > work. Buster is also affected.
>
> Please, don't be too fast when thinking about a revert.  Several of my
> colleagues (Debian users) cling to the feature since they need it for
> using the company's LXC containers; if permit_mounts_in_userns is
> removed again, they might be forced to switch to non-Debian kernels or
> to live-patch the kernel with fragile stuff like [1], cp. #913880.

I mean if you can't even remove a directory with files, it's too broken to use.
So your colleagues find the userns overlay works?
Or you mean we should take Ubuntu's patch to fix the issue?

-- 
Shengjing Zhu

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> - 2020-08-29 16:20 +0200
  Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> - 2020-09-02 06:00 +0200
    Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> - 2020-09-16 10:10 +0200
      Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> - 2020-09-16 19:00 +0200
        Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> - 2020-09-16 21:00 +0200
          Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> - 2020-09-16 21:10 +0200
            Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> - 2020-12-11 09:30 +0100
              Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> - 2021-03-03 08:50 +0100
                Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> - 2021-03-03 10:40 +0100
                Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> - 2021-03-03 11:40 +0100
                Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> - 2021-03-03 16:00 +0100
                Bug#969223: Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> - 2021-03-11 07:20 +0100

csiph-web