Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel > #111802 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-05-19 12:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2024-05-19 12:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.devel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Re: Suggestions about i386 support Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2024-05-19 12:10 +0200
| From | Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-05-19 12:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Re: Suggestions about i386 support |
| Message-ID | <IFLEl-eo8o-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 09:09:10AM +0000, defrag mentation wrote: > > What will this solve? > > > I don't think this is "needed"? Unless you think all i386 packages will be > > removed from Debian, which is not the plan? > > Case 1: Debian removed i386 DVDs/BDs, and someone jigdo backed the full amd64 DVDs/BDs set will be surprised that it do not contain wine32. This isn't specific to wine. > > Debian wine is not the only thing we want i386 libraries for. > > What are they? Non-Debian Wine (e.g. Proton), legacy native apps, probably other non-Wine wrappers. -- WBR, wRAR
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.devel
csiph-web