Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.devel.testing > #1393 > unrolled thread

Bug#1035535: Debian 11 -> 12: manual "apt install" needed to update some packages (vkd3d, appindicator, wx)

Started byPaul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
First post2023-06-04 11:30 +0200
Last post2023-06-16 22:40 +0200
Articles 2 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.devel.testing

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#1035535: Debian 11 -> 12: manual "apt install" needed to update some packages (vkd3d, appindicator, wx) Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2023-06-04 11:30 +0200
    Bug#1035535: Debian 11 -> 12: manual "apt install" needed to update some packages (vkd3d, appindicator, wx) Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2023-06-16 22:40 +0200

#1393 — Bug#1035535: Debian 11 -> 12: manual "apt install" needed to update some packages (vkd3d, appindicator, wx)

FromPaul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
Date2023-06-04 11:30 +0200
SubjectBug#1035535: Debian 11 -> 12: manual "apt install" needed to update some packages (vkd3d, appindicator, wx)
Message-ID<GCSdH-dzLl-3@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

reassign

Hi,

First of all, thanks for reporting issues you experience and sorry it 
took a while to reply.

On 05-05-2023 04:27, kolAflash@kolahilft.de wrote:
> But "apt dist-upgrade" didn't upgrade some packages.

Did you follow the upgrade procedure as outlined in the release notes, 
or is $(apt dist-upgrade) all you ran? It has happened before that apt 
can't figure out an upgrade path in one go, but when ran twice it does 
(the bullseye release notes had something on a particular known problem 
IIRC).

> So I had to do it 
> manually. Should it be that way?

Ideally not, no.

>    apt install \
>      vkd3d-compiler/bookworm \
>      libvkd3d-dev/bookworm \
>      libvkd3d-dev:i386/bookworm \
>      libappindicator1/bookworm
> 
> By this the vkd3d packages where upgraded to bookworm and 
> libappindicator1 was replaced with libayatana-appindicator1 and 
> libayatana-indicator7.

Hmm.

> I also had wx3.0-headers installed.
> And I had to install the new +version manually.
> 
>    apt install wx3.2-headers
> 
> 
> Maybe related:
> My "apt dist-upgrade" from Debian 11 to 12 ended with an error.
> See here:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994081#32

Was this before or after the issue you pointed out above? I assume apt 
already told you before this error it wouldn't upgrade everything, 
right? Did you retry running $(apt dist-upgrade) again after this error?

Paul

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1398

FromPaul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
Date2023-06-16 22:40 +0200
Message-ID<GHooF-gmTD-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1393

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Control: reassign -1 src:wxwidgets3.2

Hi,

On 16-06-2023 22:11, kolAflash@kolahilft.de wrote:
> I tried to reproduce the problems with:
> https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bullseye/20230601-1398/debian-11-nocloud-amd64-20230601-1398.qcow2
> 
> 
> Looks like libappindicator1 may has been a leftover from Debian-10.
> -> my fault
> 
> And the vkd3d problem seems to be caused by the vkd3d-compiler package 
> from the WineHQ apt repo.
> https://wiki.winehq.org/Debian
> -> probably a fault of the WineHQ repo
> 
> Only problem left is wx3.0-headers not being upgraded to wx3.2-headers.
> As said, I tested using the debian-11-nocloud-amd64-20230601-1398.qcow2 
> image. Just these steps:
>    apt install wx3.0-headers
>    # update /etc/apt/sources.list
>    apt clean
>    apt update
>    apt full-upgrade
> And wx3.0-headers/oldstable is still installed.
> Running apt full-upgrade again doesn't upgrade the package either.

If nothing depends on the headers, I'm not surprised. wx3.0-headers has 
nothing in the archive providing it, so it's OK that it stays if nothing 
conflicts with it; see section 4.8 [1] in the release notes how to 
remove obsolete packages.

Although I now somehow doubt that there's anything wrong, I like the 
maintainers of wxwidgets3.2 to double check (hence reassigning). The bug 
can be closed if this is intended behavior.

Paul

[1] 
https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#obsolete

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.devel.testing


csiph-web