Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.devel.release > #133760 > unrolled thread

Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1

Started byJeremy Sowden <azazel@debian.org>
First post2025-06-28 16:20 +0200
Last post2025-06-30 21:10 +0200
Articles 10 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.devel.release


Contents

  Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1 Jeremy Sowden <azazel@debian.org> - 2025-06-28 16:20 +0200
    Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@debian.org> - 2025-06-28 16:40 +0200
    Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2025-06-28 17:40 +0200
      Re: Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1 Jeremy Sowden <azazel@debian.org> - 2025-06-29 11:10 +0200
        Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2025-06-29 17:50 +0200
          Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1 Jeremy Sowden <azazel@debian.org> - 2025-06-29 19:00 +0200
    Processed: Re: Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1 "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-06-28 17:40 +0200
    Processed: Re: Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1 "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-06-29 17:50 +0200
    Processed: Re: Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1 "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-06-29 19:00 +0200
    Bug#1108435: marked as done (unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-06-30 21:10 +0200

#133760 — Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1

FromJeremy Sowden <azazel@debian.org>
Date2025-06-28 16:20 +0200
SubjectBug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1
Message-ID<L2Ezn-dMZ8-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: nftables@packages.debian.org, azazel@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:nftables
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package nftables

[ Reason ]
The release of nftables currently in testing, 1.1.2, introduces a regression.
Upstream put out a new release, 1.1.3, shortly afterwards to fix this bug and
two others.  We would like to get these fixes into Trixie.

See also https://bugs.debian.org/1107417

[ Impact ]
Two existing bugs will remain unfixed and a new one will be introduced.

[ Tests ]
Two of the three fixes are covered by the upstream test-suites.

[ Risks ]
The only change to the packaging is the update to d/changelog.  The 1.1.3
upstream release itself only contains these three bug-fixes:

  $ git log --oneline v1.1.2..v1.1.3
  4431c70ca96c (tag: v1.1.3) build: Bump version to 1.1.3
  2fbade3cd990 netlink: bogus concatenated set ranges with netlink message overrun
  2c41c82296c7 evalute: make vlan pcp updates work
  63ed8af82ba0 Revert "intervals: do not merge intervals with different timeout"

so the risks should be minimal.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing

[ Other info ]
When the upstream source tar-ball for 1.1.2 was prepared, a number of output
files generated by running the test-suites were inadvertently included.  The
1.1.3 tar-ball does not contains this cruft.  The upshot is that while the
source-code changes are limited, there is a lot of noise in the debdiff because
of the removal of the junk files.

unblock nftables/1.1.2-1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#133761

FromArturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@debian.org>
Date2025-06-28 16:40 +0200
Message-ID<L2ESJ-dN5J-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#133760

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

I agree with the unblock request.

Thanks Jeremy for working on this.

regards.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#133765

FromSebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
Date2025-06-28 17:40 +0200
Message-ID<L2FON-dNFu-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#133760
Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On 2025-06-28 15:10:41 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: nftables@packages.debian.org, azazel@debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:nftables
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package nftables
> 
> [ Reason ]
> The release of nftables currently in testing, 1.1.2, introduces a regression.
> Upstream put out a new release, 1.1.3, shortly afterwards to fix this bug and
> two others.  We would like to get these fixes into Trixie.
> 
> See also https://bugs.debian.org/1107417
> 
> [ Impact ]
> Two existing bugs will remain unfixed and a new one will be introduced.
> 
> [ Tests ]
> Two of the three fixes are covered by the upstream test-suites.
> 
> [ Risks ]
> The only change to the packaging is the update to d/changelog.  The 1.1.3
> upstream release itself only contains these three bug-fixes:
> 
>   $ git log --oneline v1.1.2..v1.1.3
>   4431c70ca96c (tag: v1.1.3) build: Bump version to 1.1.3
>   2fbade3cd990 netlink: bogus concatenated set ranges with netlink message overrun
>   2c41c82296c7 evalute: make vlan pcp updates work
>   63ed8af82ba0 Revert "intervals: do not merge intervals with different timeout"
> 
> so the risks should be minimal.
> 
> [ Checklist ]
>   [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
>   [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
>   [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing

The debdiff seems to be missing.

Cheers

> 
> [ Other info ]
> When the upstream source tar-ball for 1.1.2 was prepared, a number of output
> files generated by running the test-suites were inadvertently included.  The
> 1.1.3 tar-ball does not contains this cruft.  The upshot is that while the
> source-code changes are limited, there is a lot of noise in the debdiff because
> of the removal of the junk files.
> 
> unblock nftables/1.1.2-1
> 

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#133793

FromJeremy Sowden <azazel@debian.org>
Date2025-06-29 11:10 +0200
Message-ID<L2WcV-dYdL-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#133765

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 2025-06-28, at 17:31:19 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2025-06-28 15:10:41 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: nftables@packages.debian.org, azazel@debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:nftables
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package nftables
> >
> > [ Reason ]
> > The release of nftables currently in testing, 1.1.2, introduces a
> > regression.  Upstream put out a new release, 1.1.3, shortly afterwards to
> > fix this bug and two others.  We would like to get these fixes into Trixie.
> >
> > See also https://bugs.debian.org/1107417
> >
> > [ Impact ]
> > Two existing bugs will remain unfixed and a new one will be introduced.
> >
> > [ Tests ]
> > Two of the three fixes are covered by the upstream test-suites.
> >
> > [ Risks ]
> > The only change to the packaging is the update to d/changelog.  The 1.1.3
> > upstream release itself only contains these three bug-fixes:
> >
> >   $ git log --oneline v1.1.2..v1.1.3
> >   4431c70ca96c (tag: v1.1.3) build: Bump version to 1.1.3
> >   2fbade3cd990 netlink: bogus concatenated set ranges with netlink message overrun
> >   2c41c82296c7 evalute: make vlan pcp updates work
> >   63ed8af82ba0 Revert "intervals: do not merge intervals with different timeout"
> >
> > so the risks should be minimal.
> >
> > [ Checklist ]
> >   [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
> >   [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
> >   [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
>
> The debdiff seems to be missing.

Yeah, I spotted that and sent it later.  It's in the bug report:

   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108435#17

but for some reason it didn't make it to the mailing-list.

J.

> > [ Other info ]
> > When the upstream source tar-ball for 1.1.2 was prepared, a number of
> > output files generated by running the test-suites were inadvertently
> > included.  The 1.1.3 tar-ball does not contains this cruft.  The upshot is
> > that while the source-code changes are limited, there is a lot of noise in
> > the debdiff because of the removal of the junk files.
> >
> > unblock nftables/1.1.2-1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#133817

FromSebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
Date2025-06-29 17:50 +0200
Message-ID<L32s1-e273-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#133793
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed

On 2025-06-29 10:09:00 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> On 2025-06-28, at 17:31:19 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2025-06-28 15:10:41 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > X-Debbugs-Cc: nftables@packages.debian.org, azazel@debian.org
> > > Control: affects -1 + src:nftables
> > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: unblock
> > >
> > > Please unblock package nftables
> > >
> > > [ Reason ]
> > > The release of nftables currently in testing, 1.1.2, introduces a
> > > regression.  Upstream put out a new release, 1.1.3, shortly afterwards to
> > > fix this bug and two others.  We would like to get these fixes into Trixie.
> > >
> > > See also https://bugs.debian.org/1107417
> > >
> > > [ Impact ]
> > > Two existing bugs will remain unfixed and a new one will be introduced.
> > >
> > > [ Tests ]
> > > Two of the three fixes are covered by the upstream test-suites.
> > >
> > > [ Risks ]
> > > The only change to the packaging is the update to d/changelog.  The 1.1.3
> > > upstream release itself only contains these three bug-fixes:
> > >
> > >   $ git log --oneline v1.1.2..v1.1.3
> > >   4431c70ca96c (tag: v1.1.3) build: Bump version to 1.1.3
> > >   2fbade3cd990 netlink: bogus concatenated set ranges with netlink message overrun
> > >   2c41c82296c7 evalute: make vlan pcp updates work
> > >   63ed8af82ba0 Revert "intervals: do not merge intervals with different timeout"
> > >
> > > so the risks should be minimal.
> > >
> > > [ Checklist ]
> > >   [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
> > >   [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
> > >   [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
> > 
> > The debdiff seems to be missing.
> 
> Yeah, I spotted that and sent it later.  It's in the bug report:
> 
>   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108435#17
> 
> but for some reason it didn't make it to the mailing-list.

That is a good sign that the upload is not aligned with freeze policy.
But in this case, it is actually because of this:

> > > [ Other info ]
> > > When the upstream source tar-ball for 1.1.2 was prepared, a number of
> > > output files generated by running the test-suites were inadvertently
> > > included.  The 1.1.3 tar-ball does not contains this cruft.  The upshot is
> > > that while the source-code changes are limited, there is a lot of noise in
> > > the debdiff because of the removal of the junk files.

In such a case, feel free to filter the debdiff to make it reviewable.

In any case, please go ahead. When the upload is available in unstable,
please remove the moreinfo tag.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#133819

FromJeremy Sowden <azazel@debian.org>
Date2025-06-29 19:00 +0200
Message-ID<L33xL-e2Mx-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#133817

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo

On 2025-06-29, at 17:39:50 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
>
> On 2025-06-29 10:09:00 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> > On 2025-06-28, at 17:31:19 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > On 2025-06-28 15:10:41 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: nftables@packages.debian.org, azazel@debian.org
> > > > Control: affects -1 + src:nftables
> > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > > Usertags: unblock
> > > >
> > > > Please unblock package nftables
> > > >
> > > > [ Reason ]
> > > > The release of nftables currently in testing, 1.1.2, introduces a
> > > > regression.  Upstream put out a new release, 1.1.3, shortly afterwards to
> > > > fix this bug and two others.  We would like to get these fixes into Trixie.
> > > >
> > > > See also https://bugs.debian.org/1107417
> > > >
> > > > [ Impact ]
> > > > Two existing bugs will remain unfixed and a new one will be introduced.
> > > >
> > > > [ Tests ]
> > > > Two of the three fixes are covered by the upstream test-suites.
> > > >
> > > > [ Risks ]
> > > > The only change to the packaging is the update to d/changelog.  The 1.1.3
> > > > upstream release itself only contains these three bug-fixes:
> > > >
> > > >   $ git log --oneline v1.1.2..v1.1.3
> > > >   4431c70ca96c (tag: v1.1.3) build: Bump version to 1.1.3
> > > >   2fbade3cd990 netlink: bogus concatenated set ranges with netlink message overrun
> > > >   2c41c82296c7 evalute: make vlan pcp updates work
> > > >   63ed8af82ba0 Revert "intervals: do not merge intervals with different timeout"
> > > >
> > > > so the risks should be minimal.
> > > >
> > > > [ Checklist ]
> > > >   [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
> > > >   [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
> > > >   [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
> > >
> > > The debdiff seems to be missing.
> >
> > Yeah, I spotted that and sent it later.  It's in the bug report:
> >
> >   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108435#17
> >
> > but for some reason it didn't make it to the mailing-list.
>
> That is a good sign that the upload is not aligned with freeze policy.
> But in this case, it is actually because of this:
>
> > > > [ Other info ]
> > > > When the upstream source tar-ball for 1.1.2 was prepared, a number of
> > > > output files generated by running the test-suites were inadvertently
> > > > included.  The 1.1.3 tar-ball does not contains this cruft.  The upshot is
> > > > that while the source-code changes are limited, there is a lot of noise in
> > > > the debdiff because of the removal of the junk files.
>
> In such a case, feel free to filter the debdiff to make it reviewable.
>
> In any case, please go ahead. When the upload is available in unstable,
> please remove the moreinfo tag.

Thanks, done.

J.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#133769 — Processed: Re: Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2025-06-28 17:40 +0200
SubjectProcessed: Re: Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1
Message-ID<L2FON-dNFu-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#133760
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1108435 [release.debian.org] unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
1108435: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108435
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#133816 — Processed: Re: Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2025-06-29 17:50 +0200
SubjectProcessed: Re: Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1
Message-ID<L32s1-e273-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#133760
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Bug #1108435 [release.debian.org] unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.

-- 
1108435: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108435
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#133818 — Processed: Re: Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2025-06-29 19:00 +0200
SubjectProcessed: Re: Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1
Message-ID<L33xL-e2Mx-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#133760
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1108435 [release.debian.org] unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
1108435: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108435
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#133844 — Bug#1108435: marked as done (unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1)

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2025-06-30 21:10 +0200
SubjectBug#1108435: marked as done (unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1)
Message-ID<L3s37-eiJc-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#133760

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Mon, 30 Jun 2025 19:07:22 +0000
with message-id <E1uWJqc-002f2D-2l@respighi.debian.org>
and subject line unblock nftables
has caused the Debian Bug report #1108435,
regarding unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1108435: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108435
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.devel.release


csiph-web