Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.devel.release > #95969 > unrolled thread

Bug#894049: marked as done (transition: ncurses)

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.devel.release

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Bug#894049: marked as done (transition: ncurses) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2020-05-31 20:50 +0200
    Bug#894049: marked as done (transition: ncurses) R hertoric <rhetoricbomb@gmail.com> - 2020-06-02 07:20 +0200

#95969 — Bug#894049: marked as done (transition: ncurses)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Sun, 31 May 2020 20:29:18 +0200
with message-id <7f60b78d-6907-a4f4-ce15-85a5ba234018@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#894049: transition: ncurses
has caused the Debian Bug report #894049,
regarding transition: ncurses
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
894049: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894049
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#95990

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

What stretch-pu ftp Masters to download the

On Sun, May 31, 2020, 1:45 PM Debian Bug Tracking System <
owner@bugs.debian.org> wrote:

> Your message dated Sun, 31 May 2020 20:29:18 +0200
> with message-id <7f60b78d-6907-a4f4-ce15-85a5ba234018@debian.org>
> and subject line Re: Bug#894049: transition: ncurses
> has caused the Debian Bug report #894049,
> regarding transition: ncurses
> to be marked as done.
>
> This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
> If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
> Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
>
> (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
> message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
> misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
> immediately.)
>
>
> --
> 894049: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894049
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 21:51:37 +0200
> Subject: transition: ncurses
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> I would like to start a transition for ncurses, changing the soname of
> the libraries from 5 to 6.  This affects a large number of packages
> (about 600 of them), but should be doable almost exclusively via
> binNMUs, with two exceptions:
>
> - libcdk5 needs a sourceful upload and a rename of the library package,
>   neither this package nor its three reverse dependencies should be
>   rebuilt before that.  Please see https://bugs.debian.org/892280 and
>   https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcdk5.html.
>
> - cwidget also needs a sourceful upload and either a package rename or a
>   shlibs bump + versioned Breaks against aptitude, please see
>   https://bugs.debian.org/891161 for details.  Fortunately both cwidget
>   and aptitude currently FTBFS with libncursesw6, so there is no danger
>   of incompatible combinations after binNMUs.
>
> The packages libtinfo5, libncurses5 and libncursesw5 are still built, so
> only packages depending on the multilib packages and the udeb become
> uninstallable and need to be rebuilt right away: grub, readline and
> screen.
>
> Apart from cwidget/aptitude, I have not noticed any ncurses related
> FTBFS bugs, and the API is unchanged.  However, there will certainly be
> quite a few unrelated FTBFS problems, such as the recent switch to
> openjdk-9 and the python3.6/python3-distutils breakage.
>
> Suggested ben file (please check if it is correct):
>
> title = "ncurses";
> is_affected = .depends ~
> /\b(lib32ncurses6|lib32ncursesw6|lib32tinfo6|lib64ncurses6|lib64ncursesw6|lib64tinfo6|libncurses6|libncursesw6|libtinfo6|libtinfo6\-udeb|lib32ncurses5|lib32ncursesw5|lib32tinfo5|lib64ncurses5|lib64tinfo5|libncurses5|libncursesw5|libtinfo5|libtinfo5\-udeb)\b/;
> is_good = .depends ~
> /\b(lib32ncurses6|lib32ncursesw6|lib32tinfo6|lib64ncurses6|lib64ncursesw6|lib64tinfo6|libncurses6|libncursesw6|libtinfo6|libtinfo6\-udeb)\b/;
> is_bad = .depends ~
> /\b(lib32ncurses5|lib32ncursesw5|lib32tinfo5|lib64ncurses5|lib64tinfo5|libncurses5|libncursesw5|libtinfo5|libtinfo5\-udeb)\b/
> & ! .package ~ /\b(libncursesw5|libncurses5)\b/;
>
> Thanks for your consideration,
> Sven
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
> To: 894049-done@bugs.debian.org, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 20:29:18 +0200
> Subject: Re: Bug#894049: transition: ncurses
> Hi,
>
> On 12-09-2019 11:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Let's move this report a bit out of the way, but not close it as it
> > isn't really finished.
>
> I think it's all done now. The last pieces of *this* transition are gone.
>
> Paul
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.devel.release

csiph-web