Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.devel.release > #123572

Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1)

From Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.devel.release
Subject Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1)
Date 2024-03-30 00:20 +0100
Message-ID <IntFT-2CZY-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Intwd-2CWQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Ansgar 🙀 <ansgar@43-1.org> wrote on 29/03/2024 at 23:59:38+0100:

> Hi,
>
> how should we react to the compromised xz-utils upload?
>
> Ubuntu is reverting their amd64 binaries to pre-Feb 25 and rebuilding
> stuff.
>
> On Debian side AFAIU currently amd64 buildds are paused and pending
> reinstall (plus rotation of key material, both OpenPGP and SSH).
>
> People are starting to investigate packages that have been built since
> the compromised xz-utils was uploaded, including packages built for
> stable suites using reproducible builds. Is there someone keeping track
> of this?
>
> Should we also reset the archive to some prior state and rebuilt
> packages like Ubuntu? Do we need to revert to an earlier date as
> vulnerable versions have been uploaded to experimental on 2024-02-01
> (but the earlier version might only have corrupted test files, not the
> payload enabler)? If so, which suites and which architectures? (This
> will likely take a while to prepare.)

Considering the payload enabler, I'd focus on amd64 arch and not touch
the archive for anything else.

> Do we need any other immediate actions?
>
> Should we use something other than mail to keep track of what we want
> to do? (Mail threads can become hard to keep track of after all.)

Not sure, but RT could serve this purpose I guess. Or, alternatively, a
(reasonably private) pad.

> (Let us please keep future improvements such as more isolated builds
> out of this particular discussion.)

-- 
PEB

Back to linux.debian.devel.release | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1) Ansgar 🙀 <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2024-03-30 00:10 +0100
  Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1) Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2024-03-30 00:20 +0100
  Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1) Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2024-03-30 09:30 +0100
  Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1) Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-03-30 10:50 +0100
    Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1) Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-03-30 12:40 +0100

csiph-web