Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel.release > #123572
| From | Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel.release |
| Subject | Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1) |
| Date | 2024-03-30 00:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <IntFT-2CZY-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Intwd-2CWQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Ansgar 🙀 <ansgar@43-1.org> wrote on 29/03/2024 at 23:59:38+0100: > Hi, > > how should we react to the compromised xz-utils upload? > > Ubuntu is reverting their amd64 binaries to pre-Feb 25 and rebuilding > stuff. > > On Debian side AFAIU currently amd64 buildds are paused and pending > reinstall (plus rotation of key material, both OpenPGP and SSH). > > People are starting to investigate packages that have been built since > the compromised xz-utils was uploaded, including packages built for > stable suites using reproducible builds. Is there someone keeping track > of this? > > Should we also reset the archive to some prior state and rebuilt > packages like Ubuntu? Do we need to revert to an earlier date as > vulnerable versions have been uploaded to experimental on 2024-02-01 > (but the earlier version might only have corrupted test files, not the > payload enabler)? If so, which suites and which architectures? (This > will likely take a while to prepare.) Considering the payload enabler, I'd focus on amd64 arch and not touch the archive for anything else. > Do we need any other immediate actions? > > Should we use something other than mail to keep track of what we want > to do? (Mail threads can become hard to keep track of after all.) Not sure, but RT could serve this purpose I guess. Or, alternatively, a (reasonably private) pad. > (Let us please keep future improvements such as more isolated builds > out of this particular discussion.) -- PEB
Back to linux.debian.devel.release | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1) Ansgar 🙀 <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2024-03-30 00:10 +0100
Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1) Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2024-03-30 00:20 +0100
Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1) Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2024-03-30 09:30 +0100
Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1) Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-03-30 10:50 +0100
Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1) Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-03-30 12:40 +0100
csiph-web