Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #404722 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chrysostomos Nanakos <chris@include.gr> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-11-16 23:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2025-11-24 11:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1039431: Maintaining yubiserver in Authentication tools packaging team? Chrysostomos Nanakos <chris@include.gr> - 2025-11-16 23:10 +0100
Bug#1039431: Maintaining yubiserver in Authentication tools packaging team? Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2025-11-20 13:00 +0100
Bug#1039431: Maintaining yubiserver in Authentication tools packaging team? Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2025-11-20 14:50 +0100
Bug#1039431: Maintaining yubiserver in Authentication tools packaging team? Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2025-11-24 11:40 +0100
| From | Chrysostomos Nanakos <chris@include.gr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-16 23:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#1039431: Maintaining yubiserver in Authentication tools packaging team? |
| Message-ID | <LRT6y-duqw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Andreas, fair enough. Let’s remove it with next step being the packaging of yubiserver-rs. Kind regards, Chrysostomos. > On 16 Nov 2025, at 19:07, Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi again, > > Am Sat, Aug 02, 2025 at 07:46:56AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: >> Am Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 11:01:05PM +0300 schrieb Chrysostomos Nanakos: >>> Hey Andreas, >>> just saw your email with regard the yubiserver. >> >> thanks a lot for your fast response. >> >>> I have stopped working on this implementation and using the rust implementation instead. It can be found here if you are interested replacing it or use it: >>> >>> https://github.com/cnanakos/yubiserver-rs >> >> Cool. This sounds very promising. > > While yubiserver-rs sounds promising it means on the other hand that the > yubiserver package in Debian is orphaned. Now since bug has RC severity > it might make sense to remove this packagage from Debian and I intend to > do so after waiting one month. > >>> I would like to find some time package it and replace the existing one but with no luck so far. >> >> I admit I would like to support your packaging attempt but I can't >> promise anything since I have no experience with Rust packaging. I >> trust that someone in the team might help in case of stumbling stones. >> >> Could you be more verbose about "no luck so far"? >> >> When checking the repository I noticed there are no release tags. I >> would recommend adding such tags to let the world (not only the Debian >> packagers) know, what commit might be of release quality (in contrast to >> development commits). In Debian we could point the watch file to these >> tags. > > I have not seen any tags yet. I also need to admit I did not had packaged > any Rust package yet and can't backup your attempt with any knowledge here. > >> Alternatively we could create a new package yubiserver-rs make it >> providing yubiserver and remove the original yubiserver from Debian (if >> you think there is no real use for it any more). > > Mean while I think removing the current package from Debian seems like a > sensible way to go to not attract users to orphaned security software. > > Kind regards > Andreas. > > -- > https://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-20 13:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <LTbup-emZf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #404722 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi If you need a sponsor for yubiserver-rs, please reach out -- it would be nice to have a replacement in Debian. Btw, I suggest to use pkg-security team rather than pkg-auth-maintainers, I'm trying to wind down the latter. /Simon Chrysostomos Nanakos <chris@include.gr> writes: > Hi Andreas, > fair enough. Let’s remove it with next step being the packaging of yubiserver-rs. > > Kind regards, > Chrysostomos. > >> On 16 Nov 2025, at 19:07, Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> wrote: >> >> Hi again, >> >> Am Sat, Aug 02, 2025 at 07:46:56AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: >>> Am Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 11:01:05PM +0300 schrieb Chrysostomos Nanakos: >>>> Hey Andreas, >>>> just saw your email with regard the yubiserver. >>> >>> thanks a lot for your fast response. >>> >>>> I have stopped working on this implementation and using the rust >>>> implementation instead. It can be found here if you are interested >>>> replacing it or use it: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/cnanakos/yubiserver-rs >>> >>> Cool. This sounds very promising. >> >> While yubiserver-rs sounds promising it means on the other hand that the >> yubiserver package in Debian is orphaned. Now since bug has RC severity >> it might make sense to remove this packagage from Debian and I intend to >> do so after waiting one month. >> >>>> I would like to find some time package it and replace the existing one but with no luck so far. >>> >>> I admit I would like to support your packaging attempt but I can't >>> promise anything since I have no experience with Rust packaging. I >>> trust that someone in the team might help in case of stumbling stones. >>> >>> Could you be more verbose about "no luck so far"? >>> >>> When checking the repository I noticed there are no release tags. I >>> would recommend adding such tags to let the world (not only the Debian >>> packagers) know, what commit might be of release quality (in contrast to >>> development commits). In Debian we could point the watch file to these >>> tags. >> >> I have not seen any tags yet. I also need to admit I did not had packaged >> any Rust package yet and can't backup your attempt with any knowledge here. >> >>> Alternatively we could create a new package yubiserver-rs make it >>> providing yubiserver and remove the original yubiserver from Debian (if >>> you think there is no real use for it any more). >> >> Mean while I think removing the current package from Debian seems like a >> sensible way to go to not attract users to orphaned security software. >> >> Kind regards >> Andreas. >> >> -- >> https://fam-tille.de > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-20 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <LTdcR-eo9s-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #404971 |
Hi, Am Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 12:51:17PM +0100 schrieb Simon Josefsson: > If you need a sponsor for yubiserver-rs, please reach out -- it would be > nice to have a replacement in Debian. Btw, I suggest to use > pkg-security team rather than pkg-auth-maintainers, I'm trying to wind > down the latter. Thank you Simon for offering sponsoring. Perhaps you can also give anybody who is interested to maintain yubiserver-rs access to the relevant group on Salsa. I'd be happy if someone could take over from here. Kind regards Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-24 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <LUC9b-fn9b-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #404971 |
Hi Chrysostomos, Am Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 12:12:31PM +0200 schrieb Chrysostomos Nanakos: > I should be able to look into starting the packaging work later this year > or, more realistically, early next year. Sounds very good. Just let us know if you need any help Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.rc
csiph-web