Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #392072 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Leseratte10@vodafone.de |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-05-19 07:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2025-07-02 18:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 6 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc
Bug#1106035: zfs: Upstream patch for old encryption data corruption bug Leseratte10@vodafone.de - 2025-05-19 07:00 +0200
Processed: Re: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1106035: zfs: Upstream patch for old encryption data corruption bug "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-05-19 08:00 +0200
Bug#1106035: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1106035: zfs: Upstream patch for old encryption data corruption bug Florian Bach <Leseratte10@vodafone.de> - 2025-05-19 19:40 +0200
Bug#1106035: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1106035: zfs: Upstream patch for old encryption data corruption bug Leseratte10@vodafone.de - 2025-05-21 16:30 +0200
Bug#1106035: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1106035: zfs: Upstream patch for old encryption data corruption bug Florian Bach <Leseratte10@vodafone.de> - 2025-06-21 14:30 +0200
Processed: Deliberately removing zfs from trixie "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-07-02 18:20 +0200
| From | Leseratte10@vodafone.de |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-19 07:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1106035: zfs: Upstream patch for old encryption data corruption bug |
| Message-ID | <KO0Lw-48CS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Package: zfs-dkms Version: 2.3.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream patch Dear Maintainer, since the release of ZFS 2.0.0 back in 2020, ZFS contains a corruption bug where snapshots and/or a dataset can get corrupted when using ZFS encryption, if you're performing a "zfs send" at the same time as making a snapshot (which can lead to data loss in specific scenarios, which is why I tagged this as 'grave'; feel free to downgrade if you disagree). This has been discussed upstream for years at https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/12014, but since the corruption wasn't deterministic and it was hard to create a proper test, this was apparently extremely hard to bisect. Recently, though, people finally managed to reproduce this issue in a controlled environment, were able to bisect the bug to merge request https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/7958. A proposed fix for the issue is available at https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/17340. If I'm reading the comments correctly, then this is clear broken behavior (two functions are called that should never be called in this way), and even though it's not 100% certain yet that this is definitely the fix for this long-standing issue, people are fairly certain it is, and there's already discussions about backporting it to 2.2.x (https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/17325). Given that we're in Hard Freeze already, I doubt that zfs-2.3.3 will get released in time to still make it into trixie. However, given that A) the fix is extremely simple (two lines of code changed), B) it fixes a bug that can lead to data loss, C) the current implementation is definitely wrong, I was wondering if that change can be added to Debian's package and released as a 2.3.2-2 or similar (and maybe even backported to bookworm-bpo).
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-19 08:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Processed: Re: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1106035: zfs: Upstream patch for old encryption data corruption bug |
| Message-ID | <KO1Hz-49bu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #392072 |
Processing control commands: > found -1 2.0.3-1 Bug #1106035 [zfs-dkms] zfs: Upstream patch for old encryption data corruption bug Marked as found in versions zfs-linux/2.0.3-1. -- 1106035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1106035 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Florian Bach <Leseratte10@vodafone.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-19 19:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1106035: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1106035: zfs: Upstream patch for old encryption data corruption bug |
| Message-ID | <KOcD0-4g9q-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #392072 |
Am 19.05.25 um 07:46 schrieb Antonio Russo: > > There is progress on this, but it is occurring in real time. My suggestion > is to wait for upstream to decide they understand it, finalize the PR, > merge > it, and then back port the fix to 2.3. This last step may be painful, > since > the analysis may have to be re-done on the early state of the code in 2.3. The fix has just been merged into master so it seems like upstream thinks it's finalized enough. As for backporting, should be fairly easy. I took a look at the affected file, and that file (or at least the related code) hasn't been modified since it was introduced 6 years ago, so should be fairly simple to backport to whatever version, even way back to 2.0.0 if necessary. Unless I'm missing something? > I would recommend reducing the severity of this bug to important so that > zfs is not removed from trixie. I thought a bug with potential data loss would be correctly classified as "grave", but I don't know much about how Debian usually handles situations like these where the bug has existed for a long time already. I'm happy to downgrade this to important (if necessary) if the package will be removed from trixie otherwise. But right now, at least to me, there should still be enough time to get this fixed, right? Best, Florian Bach
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Leseratte10@vodafone.de |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-21 16:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1106035: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1106035: zfs: Upstream patch for old encryption data corruption bug |
| Message-ID | <KOSCd-4HNB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #392072 |
On Tue, 20 May 2025 05:54:30 -0600 Antonio Russo wrote: > See also [1], which presumably will cherry-pick the fix onto 2.2 > without changes. If that is indeed the case, we should probably > cherry pick it as is, too. One of the other patches referenced in that discussion ([1]) should probably be included as well. Either as part of a 2.3.3 release (if that happens soon enough) or as a debian patch. That patch is basically the same error (mismatch between dsl_dataset_rele and dsl_dataset_rele_flags) as the one that's confirmed to cause the data corruption, just in another location (so it might be causing other corruption elsewhere) and it's also mentioned for inclusion in 2.2.8. Best, Florian [1] https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/17353
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Florian Bach <Leseratte10@vodafone.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-21 14:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1106035: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1106035: zfs: Upstream patch for old encryption data corruption bug |
| Message-ID | <L05w5-c7X9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #392072 |
Is there any update about this bug report yet? Will the fix be backported to the current release or will zfs 2.3.3 still make it into trixie? ZFS 2.3.3 which includes all these fixes has been released last Thursday. Is there any work being done either getting this version packaged, or back-porting the bugfixes? In its current state, zfs would get autoremoved on July 2nd, so either a backport or a new release is needed until then, or the severity needs to be reduced (which is a solution I don't really like). Best, Florian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-02 18:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Processed: Deliberately removing zfs from trixie |
| Message-ID | <L48lH-eKBD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #392072 |
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1106035 [zfs-dkms] zfs: Upstream patch for old encryption data corruption bug Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' -- 1106035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1106035 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.rc
csiph-web