Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #383679 > unrolled thread

Bug#1088816: simplesamlphp 2.x for trixie? (Re: Bug#1088816: Current version not supported)

Started bySantiago Ruano Rincón <santiagorr@riseup.net>
First post2025-02-06 16:10 +0100
Last post2025-02-06 16:10 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#1088816: simplesamlphp 2.x for trixie? (Re: Bug#1088816: Current version not supported) Santiago Ruano Rincón <santiagorr@riseup.net> - 2025-02-06 16:10 +0100

#383679 — Bug#1088816: simplesamlphp 2.x for trixie? (Re: Bug#1088816: Current version not supported)

FromSantiago Ruano Rincón <santiagorr@riseup.net>
Date2025-02-06 16:10 +0100
SubjectBug#1088816: simplesamlphp 2.x for trixie? (Re: Bug#1088816: Current version not supported)
Message-ID<KdbFU-eRdY-5@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Control: User -1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
Control: Usertag -1 + upstream-trixie

Hello Thijs and LTS team,

El 01/12/24 a las 17:38, Thijs Kinkhorst escribió:
> Package: simplesamlphp
> Severity: grave
> Tags: trixie sid
> 
> The current package in testing and unstable is version 1.19. Upstream no
> longer supports this version. There's a 2.x series which should be
> packaged.
> 
> There are a number of changes required for packaging 2.x. Most notably
> the list of shipped modules is much smaller, which needs some
> consideration.
> 
> In any case Debian should not ship a 1.19 package in trixie, hence
> this bug which can be closed if a 2.x version is packaged at some
> point.

This is just a heads-up about the status of simplesamlphp in trixie,
which is currently missing.

Thijs, could we interpret the above as you are OK with a "Team-upload"
(as the package is in salsa.d.o/debian), or an NMU to package
simplesamlphp 2.x?
Please, don't hesitate to tell me if that is wrong.

Someone from the LTS team, may be interested in contributing (CC'ing
debian-lts).

Best regards,

 -- Santiago, for the LTS Team.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.rc


csiph-web