Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #389073 > unrolled thread

Bug#1102612: mpich 4.3 not initialising multiple processes

Started byDrew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
First post2025-04-11 02:00 +0200
Last post2025-04-16 13:20 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc


Contents

  Bug#1102612: mpich 4.3 not initialising multiple processes Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2025-04-11 02:00 +0200
    Bug#1102612: mpich 4.3 not initialising multiple processes Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2025-04-11 17:20 +0200
    Bug#1102612: mpich 4.3 not initialising multiple processes Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2025-04-14 17:30 +0200
    Bug#1102612: marked as done (mpich 4.3 not initialising multiple  processes) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-04-16 13:20 +0200

#389073 — Bug#1102612: mpich 4.3 not initialising multiple processes

FromDrew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
Date2025-04-11 02:00 +0200
SubjectBug#1102612: mpich 4.3 not initialising multiple processes
Message-ID<KA9Yl-cCDZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Package: mpich
Version: 4.3.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: debci

I apologise for another serious bug, but mpich 4.3 is doing weird
things that we don't want in trixie. I see the problem in mpich test
errors in armci-mpi
(https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=armci-mpi&arch=amd64&ver=0.4-5&stamp=1744327219&raw=0 )
but can reproduce in a trivial test.

The problem is that mpich is not initialising multiple processes.
Instead it is simply launching multiple single processes (each with
MPI_Comm_size = 1).

You can see the problem in the armci-mpi test errors, e.g.

FAIL: benchmarks/ping-pong
==========================

[1744327153.607644] [sbuild:19884:0]            sock.c:513  UCX  WARN  unable to read somaxconn value from /proc/sys/net/core/somaxconn file
[0] ARMCI Error: This benchmark should be run on at least two processes
Abort(1) on node 0 (rank 0 in comm 496): application called MPI_Abort(comm=0x84000000, 1) - process 0
[0] ARMCI Error: This benchmark should be run on at least two processes
[1744327153.612861] [sbuild:19883:0]            sock.c:513  UCX  WARN  unable to read somaxconn value from /proc/sys/net/core/somaxconn file
Abort(1) on node 0 (rank 0 in comm 496): application called MPI_Abort(comm=0x84000000, 1) - process 0
FAIL benchmarks/ping-pong (exit status: 1)

The error message "at least two processes" is issued by armci-mpi's ping-pong.c,
when it detects MPI_Comm_size = 1.  But the test is launched with 
mpiexec.mpich -np 2  (that's why the error is repeated twice).

I can reproduce the issue with a trivial test:
```
$ cat mpich_test.c 
#include <stdio.h>
#include <mpi.h>

int main(int argc, char **argv) {
  int me, nproc;

  MPI_Init(&argc, &argv);

  MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &me);
  MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &nproc);

  printf("mpi test rank %d of %d\n", me, nproc);
  MPI_Finalize();

  return 0;
}
$ mpicc.mpich -o mpich_test mpich_test.c
$ mpiexec.mpich -n 4 ./mpich_test
mpi test rank 0 of 1
mpi test rank 0 of 1
mpi test rank 0 of 1
mpi test rank 0 of 1
```

It should instead be reporting
mpi test rank 3 of 4
mpi test rank 1 of 4
mpi test rank 0 of 4
mpi test rank 2 of 4


There is even more weirdness however. The first time I compiled and
ran this trivial test, it did report having 4 processes, but that
correct output was accompanied with pmix warnings:
Query for unrecognized attribute: pmix.qry.node
Query for unrecognized attribute: pmix.qry.peers

But after recompiling the same way, it no longer gave the correct output
but also did not give the pmix warnings.

Can you reproduce this problem?


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.12.21-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_AU:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages mpich depends on:
ii  hwloc          2.12.0-1
ii  libc6          2.41-6
ii  libhwloc15     2.12.0-1
ii  libmpich12     4.3.0-5
ii  libslurm42t64  24.11.3-2
ii  perl           5.40.1-2

Versions of packages mpich recommends:
ii  libmpich-dev  4.3.0-5

Versions of packages mpich suggests:
ii  mpich-doc  4.3.0-5

-- no debconf information

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#389214

FromDrew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
Date2025-04-11 17:20 +0200
Message-ID<KAokF-cMev-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#389073
Package: mpich
Followup-For: Bug #1102612

There is evidence that libucx0 might be the problem, or a problem,
in the ga (libglobalarrays-dev) build logs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ga&arch=amd64&ver=5.9.1-1&stamp=1744381093&raw=0

e.g. FAIL: global/testing/pgtest
  copy is OK 

 > Checking scatter/gather (might be slow)... 
[sbuild:90178:0:90178] ucp_request.c:212  Assertion `ucs_async_check_owner_thread(&(worker)->async)' failed
==== backtrace (tid:  90178) ====
 0  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libucs.so.0(ucs_handle_error+0x2bc) [0x7fc32aa2564c]
 1  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libucs.so.0(ucs_fatal_error_message+0xb6) [0x7fc32aa231f6]
 2  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libucs.so.0(ucs_fatal_error_format+0x11a) [0x7fc32aa2331a]
 3  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libucp.so.0(ucp_request_release+0x1a7) [0x7fc32aab7487]
 4  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmpich.so.12(+0x349457) [0x7fc32b3ff457]
 5  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmpich.so.12(+0x349685) [0x7fc32b3ff685]
 6  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libucp.so.0(ucp_am_rndv_process_rts+0x17f) [0x7fc32aa9fb9f]
 7  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libucp.so.0(ucp_rndv_rts_handler+0xbd) [0x7fc32ab20b2d]
 8  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuct.so.0(+0x21fa9) [0x7fc32a93cfa9]
 9  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuct.so.0(uct_self_ep_am_bcopy+0x7e) [0x7fc32a93d6ce]
10  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libucp.so.0(ucp_am_rndv_proto_progress+0x468) [0x7fc32aa8b1a8]
11  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libucp.so.0(ucp_am_send_nbx+0x9aa) [0x7fc32aa9b01a]
12  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmpich.so.12(+0x17d593) [0x7fc32b233593]
13  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmpich.so.12(+0x17f378) [0x7fc32b235378]
14  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmpich.so.12(MPI_Get_accumulate+0x2fc) [0x7fc32b235e3c]
15  ./global/testing/pgtest.x(+0xcd40f) [0x55c644f5140f]
16  ./global/testing/pgtest.x(+0xd3693) [0x55c644f57693]
17  ./global/testing/pgtest.x(+0xd38ba) [0x55c644f578ba]
18  ./global/testing/pgtest.x(+0xd3aaf) [0x55c644f57aaf]
19  ./global/testing/pgtest.x(+0x929db) [0x55c644f169db]
20  ./global/testing/pgtest.x(+0xfa8e) [0x55c644e93a8e]
21  ./global/testing/pgtest.x(+0x111e5) [0x55c644e951e5]
22  ./global/testing/pgtest.x(+0x117c3) [0x55c644e957c3]
23  ./global/testing/pgtest.x(+0x4d05) [0x55c644e88d05]
24  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x29ca8) [0x7fc32aebcca8]
25  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x85) [0x7fc32aebcd65]
26  ./global/testing/pgtest.x(+0x4d31) [0x55c644e88d31]
=================================

Program received signal SIGABRT: Process abort signal.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#389674

FromDrew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
Date2025-04-14 17:30 +0200
Message-ID<KBtUZ-ducN-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#389073
Package: mpich
Followup-For: Bug #1102612

Is this upstream bug related to the problem?
https://github.com/pmodels/mpich/issues/7064#issuecomment-2301026290

It suggests the pmix build configuration might be an issue.
The timing of that bug doesn't match well, though, it was made in
August 2024, before we had mpich 4.3.

On the other hand, pmix support was added to the debian mpich package
in 4.3.0-2. And Ubuntu 24.04 (the version in the upstream bug report)
has mpich 4.2.0-5build3, which did have pmix support activated.

Debian deactivated pmix support in mpich 4.2.0-5.1 (it had been
enabled in 4.2.0-1), evidently ubuntu didn't apply the update to
deactivate it.

There is more discussion from ubuntu at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpich/+bug/2072338
though no actual fix for it, just a reference to the pmix deactivation
in 4.2.0-5.1

Sounds like pmix configuration is still an issue for mpich.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#389899 — Bug#1102612: marked as done (mpich 4.3 not initialising multiple processes)

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2025-04-16 13:20 +0200
SubjectBug#1102612: marked as done (mpich 4.3 not initialising multiple processes)
Message-ID<KC8Y9-dVD1-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#389073

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Wed, 16 Apr 2025 12:05:13 +0100
with message-id <d91d2a47-69d2-4c35-8924-dbcf9ba098ef@mckinstry.ie>
and subject line Re: Bug#1102068: libfabric: FTBFS on 32-bit arches: ofi_cma.h: error: passing argument 2 of 'ofi_consume_iov' from incompatible pointer type
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102612,
regarding mpich 4.3 not initialising multiple processes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1102612: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102612
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.rc


csiph-web