Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #358007 > unrolled thread

Bug#1063088: weston: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Bug#1063088: weston: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Dylan Aïssi <bob.dybian@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 10:50 +0100
    Bug#1063088: weston: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2024-03-06 20:10 +0100

#358007 — Bug#1063088: weston: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

Hello,

Le lun. 5 févr. 2024 à 02:54, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> a écrit :
>
> If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP.  Although
> this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a
> period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if information
> becomes available that your package should not be included in the transition,
> there is time for us to amend the planned uploads.
>

I am wondering what is the plan with this package/bug? I noticed that changes
related to the 64-bit time_t transition were not uploaded to unstable and
because I uploaded several versions in unstable after your NMU in exp, I
wonder if I haven't interfered with this transition.

Best regards,
Dylan

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#358041

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 10:42:16AM +0100, Dylan Aïssi wrote:
> Hello,

> Le lun. 5 févr. 2024 à 02:54, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> a écrit :

> > If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP.  Although
> > this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a
> > period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if information
> > becomes available that your package should not be included in the transition,
> > there is time for us to amend the planned uploads.

> I am wondering what is the plan with this package/bug? I noticed that changes
> related to the 64-bit time_t transition were not uploaded to unstable and
> because I uploaded several versions in unstable after your NMU in exp, I
> wonder if I haven't interfered with this transition.

Sorry, yes, the uploads with renaming of both dev package and runtime lib
package in the midst of the transition resulted in this package being lost.

Since this is a completely new soname, and only packages built from weston
source depend on it, I suggest that you simply request a binNMU of weston on
armhf and armel and consider this resolved.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.rc

csiph-web