Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #286048 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-09-10 15:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2020-11-08 22:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc
Bug#970029: llvm-toolchain-8: should not be part of bullseye Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2020-09-10 15:30 +0200
Bug#970029: llvm-toolchain-8: should not be part of bullseye Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org> - 2020-09-10 15:50 +0200
Bug#970029: llvm-toolchain-8: should not be part of bullseye Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2020-09-12 12:50 +0200
Bug#970029: marked as done (llvm-toolchain-8: should not be part of bullseye) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2020-11-08 22:50 +0100
| From | Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-10 15:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#970029: llvm-toolchain-8: should not be part of bullseye |
| Message-ID | <ANuOd-7zb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Source: llvm-toolchain-8
Version: 1:8.0.1-10
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
$ dak rm -Rn llvm-toolchain-8 -s testin
Will remove the following packages from testing:
clang-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
clang-8-doc | 1:8.0.1-10 | all
clang-8-examples | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
clang-format-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
clang-tidy-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
clang-tools-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
clangd-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libc++-8-dev | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libc++1-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libc++abi-8-dev | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libc++abi1-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libclang-8-dev | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libclang-common-8-dev | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libclang1-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libfuzzer-8-dev | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
liblld-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el
liblld-8-dev | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el
liblldb-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el
liblldb-8-dev | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el
libllvm-8-ocaml-dev | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
libllvm8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libomp-8-dev | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el
libomp-8-doc | 1:8.0.1-10 | all
libomp5-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el
lld-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el
lldb-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el
llvm-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
llvm-8-dev | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
llvm-8-doc | 1:8.0.1-10 | all
llvm-8-examples | 1:8.0.1-10 | all
llvm-8-runtime | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
llvm-8-tools | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
llvm-toolchain-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | source
python-clang-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
python-lldb-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el
python3-clang-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
python3-lldb-8 | 1:8.0.1-10 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el
Maintainer: LLVM Packaging Team <pkg-llvm-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>
------------------- Reason -------------------
----------------------------------------------
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.
So I think it's time to get llvm-toolchain-8 removed from testing (and
from sid in the long run).
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-10 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ANv7z-7FJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #286048 |
Le 10/09/2020 à 15:25, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > Source: llvm-toolchain-8 > Version: 1:8.0.1-10 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bullseye > > So I think it's time to get llvm-toolchain-8 removed from testing (and > from sid in the long run). > Agreed, many thanks for filling this bug. It was on my todo list for a while :) Cheers, Sylvestre
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-12 12:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AObgt-7J8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #286049 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 2020-09-10 15:29:35 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le 10/09/2020 à 15:25, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > > Source: llvm-toolchain-8 > > Version: 1:8.0.1-10 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: sid bullseye > > > > So I think it's time to get llvm-toolchain-8 removed from testing (and > > from sid in the long run). > > > > Agreed, many thanks for filling this bug. It was on my todo list for a while :) Great, I'll add a removal hint. Once julia is fixed, it can also be removed from unstable. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-08 22:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#970029: marked as done (llvm-toolchain-8: should not be part of bullseye) |
| Message-ID | <B90Js-R5-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #286048 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Your message dated Sun, 08 Nov 2020 21:45:53 +0000 with message-id <E1kbsVV-000IV7-Ow@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#973479: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #970029, regarding llvm-toolchain-8: should not be part of bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 970029: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970029 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.rc
csiph-web