Bug#1096811: hipblas: ftbfs with GCC-15

From	Cordell Bloor <cgmb@slerp.xyz>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.rc
Subject	Bug#1096811: hipblas: ftbfs with GCC-15
Date	2025-11-19 13:00 +0100
Message-ID	<LSP0R-e7yj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<LSNV7-e6Ri-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LSNV7-e6Ri-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <LSNV7-e6Ri-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Santiago,

On 2025-11-19 03:44, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I believe this bug ("FTBFS with GCC 15") is fixed in the above
> version, so I'm closing it by hand now.

I don't know how I screwed up twice, but 6.4.1-2 FTBFS as well. I'll do 
a third upload after triple-checking my work and then this should be fixed.

> While we are at it, I noticed a very significant raise in the amount
> of memory allocated while building the package, from 2GB in trixie to
> 14GB in current unstable (using machines with 2 CPUs).
>
> Is this normal/expected?

The hipblas tests have adopted a structure more similar to rocblas and 
they're also building two binaries now instead of one. I think the new 
upstream design is just more resource intensive to build and run.

I guess it's normal.

Sincerely,
Cory Bloor

Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1096811: hipblas: ftbfs with GCC-15 Cordell Bloor <cgmb@slerp.xyz> - 2025-11-19 13:00 +0100
  Bug#1096811: hipblas: ftbfs with GCC-15 Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-11-19 13:50 +0100
    Bug#1096811: hipblas: ftbfs with GCC-15 Cordell Bloor <cgmb@slerp.xyz> - 2025-11-19 20:40 +0100

csiph-web