Bug#1027359: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#1027359: arduino-builder: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on tzdata)

From	Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.rc
Subject	Bug#1027359: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#1027359: arduino-builder: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on tzdata)
Date	2022-12-31 15:20 +0100
Message-ID	<FIKSl-eBNG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<FIrZn-enKS-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <FIKfD-eBjY-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <FIrZn-enKS-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <FIKfD-eBjY-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

El 31/12/22 a las 14:33, Rock Storm escribió:
> This is interesting because that test didn't fail before and we didn't
> need the tzdata package installed.

The tests always failed (in bullseye) in a chroot not containing tzdata.
 From my own autobuilders:

Status: failed      arduino-builder_1.3.25-2_amd64-20210129T121615.663Z
Status: failed      arduino-builder_1.3.25-2_amd64-20210129T132227.024Z

Part of the problem is that debootstrap installs tzdata by default even
if it's not build-essential, but that's a bug in debootstrap:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837060

The other part of the problem is that people use debootstrap "as is",
without asking it not to install tzdata, which produces non-minimal
chroots in which packages which build ok are still not guaranteed
to have their build-dependencies right.

(Fortunately I only found 25 packages in bullseye with this kind of
missing build-dependency, so I believe it's still feasible to make
bullseye policy compliant before it becomes oldstable).

Thanks.

Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1027359: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#1027359: arduino-builder: FTBFS in bullseye (missing build-depends on tzdata) Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2022-12-31 15:20 +0100

csiph-web