Bug#993316: systemd: missing /lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service file

From	Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.rc
Subject	Bug#993316: systemd: missing /lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service file
Date	2021-08-31 20:30 +0200
Message-ID	<CSgGd-7fl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <CS7Wh-1Kw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CSeO5-61P-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <CSfTQ-6EM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <CRSud-88F-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CSfTQ-6EM-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Michael Biebl:
> Hi Niels
> 
> Am 31.08.21 um 18:07 schrieb Niels Thykier:
> 
>> My thought is that this is not something I want in dh_link - dh_link has
>> no business second guessing the link values it gets.  Since dh_link runs
>> after dh_installsystemd, then we cannot even rely on dh_installsystemd
>> to perform a fix up either.
> 
> Nod.
> 
>> Which begins to smell like that either people have to update their
>> dh_links calls/configuration OR we roll back the dh_installsystemd
>> change to move to /usr.  I am not particular fan of either.  :-/
>>
>> Nevertheless, I am inclined to do a rollback and then punt on the "/ ->
>> /usr" migration track for now.
> 
> I'll see if I can compile a list of possibly affected packages.
> If the number is low enough, I think updating the symlink manually is
> probably ok.
> 
> Regards,
> Michael
> 
> 

I appreciate it, but I think we should be careful here with the manual
update.  If consensus on debian-devel is that debhelper should roll this
back, then we will break these packages again.

I do not think that would make us popular... :-/

~Niels

Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#993316: systemd: missing /lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service file Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2021-08-31 18:30 +0200
  Bug#993316: systemd: missing /lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service file Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2021-08-31 20:30 +0200

csiph-web