Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #885933 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-03-08 20:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2018-03-09 03:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
Bug#892407: initramfs-tools: scripts/local: ignore /dev/ram* Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2018-03-08 20:20 +0100
Bug#892407: initramfs-tools: scripts/local: ignore /dev/ram* Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-09 02:00 +0100
Bug#892407: initramfs-tools: scripts/local: ignore /dev/ram* Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2018-03-09 02:20 +0100
Bug#892407: initramfs-tools: scripts/local: ignore /dev/ram* Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-09 03:40 +0100
Bug#892407: initramfs-tools: scripts/local: ignore /dev/ram* Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2018-03-09 20:30 +0100
Bug#892407: initramfs-tools: scripts/local: ignore /dev/ram* Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-09 03:30 +0100
| From | Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-08 20:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#892407: initramfs-tools: scripts/local: ignore /dev/ram* |
| Message-ID | <vr9f4-2vP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.130
From a2aef0d83cd19d9b69a747c7ddbcee564faac914 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:38 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] scripts/local: ignore /dev/ram*
These scripts are already running in a ramdisk, so ignore
any root=/dev/ram* so we don't waste 30 sec looping.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
---
scripts/local | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/local b/scripts/local
index 4ec926cae6cb..103a8fffd7c7 100644
--- a/scripts/local
+++ b/scripts/local
@@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ local_device_setup()
local time_elapsed
local count
+ # We're already in a ramdisk, don't waste 30 sec looping waiting
+ # for /dev/ram* devices
+ expr match ${dev_id#/dev/} "ram" > /dev/null
+ if [ $? = 0 ]; then
+ echo "Ignoring ${dev_id}. We're already in a ramdisk."
+ return 1
+ fi
+
wait_for_udev 10
# Load ubi with the correct MTD partition and return since fstype
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-09 02:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vrey5-5Oh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #885933 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Are you trying to fix the LAVA health check? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings compatible: Gracefully accepts erroneous data from any source
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-09 02:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vreRr-6cw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #885962 |
I'm not sure exactly what you're referring to, so I guess that means no. I'm just trying to avoid an unnecessary delay when "root=/dev/ram*" is (mistakenly) used on the command-line when passing in the debian ramdisk. If that happens, it eventually falls through to the initramfs shell, but not before trying 30 times (with a "sleep 1" between each) to find another ramdisk on /dev/ramX On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > Are you trying to fix the LAVA health check? > > Ben. > > -- > Ben Hutchings > compatible: Gracefully accepts erroneous data from any source >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-09 03:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vrg6R-72t-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #885963 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 17:08 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: > I'm not sure exactly what you're referring to, so I guess that means no. Aren't you using LAVA in conjunction with kernelci? That's where I've seen this odd usage of "root=/dev/ram0" before. > I'm just trying to avoid an unnecessary delay when "root=/dev/ram*" is > (mistakenly) used on the command-line when passing in the debian > ramdisk. If that happens, it eventually falls through to the > initramfs shell, but not before trying 30 times (with a "sleep 1" > between each) to find another ramdisk on /dev/ramX I'm pretty sure "break" does what you need. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings compatible: Gracefully accepts erroneous data from any source
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-09 20:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vrvSh-Xf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #885969 |
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:37 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 17:08 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> I'm not sure exactly what you're referring to, so I guess that means no. > > Aren't you using LAVA in conjunction with kernelci? That's where I've > seen this odd usage of "root=/dev/ram0" before. Yes, this came up in the contect of kernelCI. >> I'm just trying to avoid an unnecessary delay when "root=/dev/ram*" is >> (mistakenly) used on the command-line when passing in the debian >> ramdisk. If that happens, it eventually falls through to the >> initramfs shell, but not before trying 30 times (with a "sleep 1" >> between each) to find another ramdisk on /dev/ramX > > I'm pretty sure "break" does what you need. Well, break does what you describe, but not exactly what I need. I'm trying to workaround the (mis)use of root=/dev/ramX on the commandline. If I could add stuff to the kernel command-line, I would instead just remove the "root=/dev/ramX" rather than add "break=premount", but I'm trying to solve the problem for LAVA labs that we don't control, so we cannot change all the device-types out there and remove "root=/dev/ram0". So, back to the patch at hand... Is there ever a usecase for the debian initrd.img to switch_root to another initrd/ramdisk? If so, then my proposed patch is invalid. If not, then it's a nice optimization and fixup for (mis)use of root=/dev/ram in conjuction with an existing initrd/ramdisk. Kevin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-09 03:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vrfXb-6VV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #885962 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 00:55 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > Are you trying to fix the LAVA health check? A longer and possibly more helpful answer: 1. initramfs-tools is primarily meant for booting a "real" system. The "root" kernel parameter says where that system is. It doesn't make sense to me to overload that parameter. 2. An initramfs is not the same thing as a ramdisk. Treating device names matching /dev/ram* specially could possibly conflict with a configuration where both an initramfs and a ramdisk are used. 3. There is already a way to tell initramfs-tools abort the boot process and start a shell - the "break" parameter, documented in initramfs-tools(8). (Hmm, that should probably be in section 7.) Ben. -- Ben Hutchings compatible: Gracefully accepts erroneous data from any source
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web