Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #814901 > unrolled thread

Bug#851885: Please add pseudopackage `manpages.debian.org'

Started byMichael Stapelberg <stapelberg@debian.org>
First post2017-03-23 11:10 +0100
Last post2017-03-23 16:00 +0100
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#851885: Please add pseudopackage `manpages.debian.org' Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@debian.org> - 2017-03-23 11:10 +0100
    Bug#851885: Please add pseudopackage `manpages.debian.org' Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2017-03-23 15:50 +0100
      Bug#851885: Please add pseudopackage `manpages.debian.org' Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@debian.org> - 2017-03-23 16:00 +0100
        Bug#851885: Please add pseudopackage `manpages.debian.org' Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2017-03-23 16:00 +0100

#814901 — Bug#851885: Please add pseudopackage `manpages.debian.org'

FromMichael Stapelberg <stapelberg@debian.org>
Date2017-03-23 11:10 +0100
SubjectBug#851885: Please add pseudopackage `manpages.debian.org'
Message-ID<to7QS-Io-23@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Sorry for the late reply.

The description looks good to me.

I don’t have a set of bugs to re-assign. I’m not sure whether the BTS was
ever used for tracking issues with manpages.debian.org before, and any
issues reported likely don’t apply anymore.

Thanks.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> > This sounds right to me.
>
> I just need to know what text to use for the description (see below for
> an example), and ideally a set of bugs which will be reassigned to the
> pseudopackage once it is created.
>
> Pseudopackage Name: manpages.debian.org
> Maintainer: Manpages Website Maintainers <debian-doc@lists.debian.org>
> Description: Issues with the Debian Manpages Website and coordination of
> maintenance
>
> Obviously, this means that there can't ever be a packaged called
> manpages.debian.org in Debian.
>
>
> --
> Don Armstrong                      https://www.donarmstrong.com
>
> That's the wonderful thing about crayons. They can take you to more
> places than a starship.
>  -- Guinan "Star Trek: The Next Generation: Rascals (#6.7)"
>



-- 
Best regards,
Michael

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#814957

FromDon Armstrong <don@debian.org>
Date2017-03-23 15:50 +0100
Message-ID<tocdQ-3va-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#814901
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply.
> 
> The description looks good to me.

Cool.

> I don’t have a set of bugs to re-assign. I’m not sure whether the BTS was
> ever used for tracking issues with manpages.debian.org before, and any
> issues reported likely don’t apply anymore.

Just a TODO list (or something else) which lists the bugs which you are
planning to create/reassign is sufficient for my purposes. [This is just
to make sure that the pseudo package is actually going to be used before
I create it; it's totally OK if those issues have already been fixed too.]


-- 
Don Armstrong                      https://www.donarmstrong.com

nothing except the impossible shall occur
 -- e.e. cummings "XLII" _1 x 1_

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#814960

FromMichael Stapelberg <stapelberg@debian.org>
Date2017-03-23 16:00 +0100
Message-ID<tocnv-3Ak-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#814957

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Oh, I’m not planning to create any bugs. I’m working with GitHub. iwj@
wanted this pseudo-package to be created, and I agreed to accept bug
reports via the pseudo package, while continuing to use GitHub as the
canonical issue tracker.

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> > Sorry for the late reply.
> >
> > The description looks good to me.
>
> Cool.
>
> > I don’t have a set of bugs to re-assign. I’m not sure whether the BTS was
> > ever used for tracking issues with manpages.debian.org before, and any
> > issues reported likely don’t apply anymore.
>
> Just a TODO list (or something else) which lists the bugs which you are
> planning to create/reassign is sufficient for my purposes. [This is just
> to make sure that the pseudo package is actually going to be used before
> I create it; it's totally OK if those issues have already been fixed too.]
>
>
> --
> Don Armstrong                      https://www.donarmstrong.com
>
> nothing except the impossible shall occur
>  -- e.e. cummings "XLII" _1 x 1_
>



-- 
Best regards,
Michael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#814962

FromIan Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Date2017-03-23 16:00 +0100
Message-ID<tocnw-3Ak-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#814960
Michael Stapelberg writes ("Re: Bug#851885: Please add pseudopackage `manpages.debian.org'"):
> Oh, I m not planning to create any bugs. I m working with GitHub. iwj@ wanted
> this pseudo-package to be created, and I agreed to accept bug reports via the
> pseudo package, while continuing to use GitHub as the canonical issue tracker.

As an example, my personal todo list has an entry to make the code
behind manpages.debian.org automatically serve up its own source in
its output.  The result of that would be a patch or pull request which
I would like to submit as a bug to the Debian BTS.

Ian.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web