Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #790314 > unrolled thread

Bug#847514: Amazon::S3 vs. Net::Amazon::S3

Started byAlex Muntada <alexm@alexm.org>
First post2016-12-12 12:50 +0100
Last post2016-12-14 10:30 +0100
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist


Contents

  Bug#847514: Amazon::S3 vs. Net::Amazon::S3 Alex Muntada <alexm@alexm.org> - 2016-12-12 12:50 +0100
    Bug#847514: Amazon::S3 vs. Net::Amazon::S3 Christopher Hoskin <christopher.hoskin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 22:10 +0100
      Bug#847514: Amazon::S3 vs. Net::Amazon::S3 Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li> - 2016-12-14 00:10 +0100
      Bug#847514: Amazon::S3 vs. Net::Amazon::S3 Alex Muntada <alexm@alexm.org> - 2016-12-14 10:30 +0100

#790314 — Bug#847514: Amazon::S3 vs. Net::Amazon::S3

FromAlex Muntada <alexm@alexm.org>
Date2016-12-12 12:50 +0100
SubjectBug#847514: Amazon::S3 vs. Net::Amazon::S3
Message-ID<sNxhg-3NJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Reading the CPAN Ratings I found out that Net::Amazon::S3
has many more dependencies (some huge ones, like Moose and
XML::LibXML) than Amazon::S3.

In my opinion, that difference should justify that we also
package Amazon::S3 for Debian since RT depends on it.

On the other side, https://github.com/tima/perl-amazon-s3
hasn't received any changes since 2009 and the CPAN RT queue
for Amazon::S3 has been unattended for several years too.
So it seems that Amazon::S3 is actually unmaintained.

FWIW, https://github.com/rustyconover/net-amazon-s3 hasn't
got any changes in more than a year either (9 issues and
3 pull requests open). I may be wrong, but I think that,
in terms of maintainership, there's no difference between
the two at this moment.

Thus, unless there's any strong opinion against it, I'll
start packaging Amazon::S3 in a few days so we can have
all RT 4.4 deps ready.

Cheers!
Alex

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#790732

FromChristopher Hoskin <christopher.hoskin@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-13 22:10 +0100
Message-ID<sO2uK-683-57@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#790314
I'd already done most of this at the weekend, so thought I might as
well upload it. Hope you don't mind!

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-perl/packages/libamazon-s3-perl.git

Christopher

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#790762

FromDominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li>
Date2016-12-14 00:10 +0100
Message-ID<sO4mS-7jz-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#790732
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:03:07PM +0000, Christopher Hoskin wrote:
> I'd already done most of this at the weekend, so thought I might as
> well upload it. Hope you don't mind!
> 
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-perl/packages/libamazon-s3-perl.git

Awesome. Thank you both!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#790854

FromAlex Muntada <alexm@alexm.org>
Date2016-12-14 10:30 +0100
Message-ID<sOe2S-4HY-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#790732

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Christopher Hoskin:

> I'd already done most of this at the weekend, so thought
> I might as well upload it. Hope you don't mind!

Not at all :)

Just remember that retitling a RFP bug into an ITP and
taking ownership makes it easier to see that somebody
is already working on the package.

Thanks!
Alex

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web