Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1271055 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-11-21 15:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2026-01-23 15:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
Bug#1121129: ITP: python-notobuilder -- "No Tofu" font families with large Unicode coverage - build tools Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> - 2025-11-21 15:40 +0100
Bug#1121129: ITP: python-notobuilder -- "No Tofu" font families with large Unicode coverage - build tools Matheus Polkorny <mpolkorny@gmail.com> - 2025-12-14 02:50 +0100
Bug#1121129: ITP: python-notobuilder -- "No Tofu" font families with large Unicode coverage - build tools Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de> - 2026-01-23 15:40 +0100
| From | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-21 15:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#1121129: ITP: python-notobuilder -- "No Tofu" font families with large Unicode coverage - build tools |
| Message-ID | <LTAsN-eEr8-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 * Package name : python-notobuilder Version : 0+20250929 Upstream Contact: https://github.com/notofonts/notobuilder/issues * URL : https://github.com/notofonts/notobuilder * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python Description : "No Tofu" font families with large Unicode coverage - build tools Noto is a collection of font families, each visually harmonized across scripts. . The name "Noto" is short for "No Tofu", describing the aim of covering all living Unicode scripts. . Tofu (豆腐) is Japanese jargon for the unicode replacement character "�" (U+FFFD) often displayed as replacement for unassigned or unknown characters. . This package contains the python3 module notobuilder, needed for generating binary Noto fonts from source. This package is needed to build Noto fonts from source. The package will be maintained in the collaborative debian section of salsa, at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/python-notobuilder -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJABAEBCgAqFiEEn+Ppw2aRpp/1PMaELHwxRsGgASEFAmkgeMoMHGRyQGpvbmVz LmRrAAoJECx8MUbBoAEh918QAJs8Ehvgt9dxz4D3HUoU+6TJtHHZjHcB4XFJa33a zgcMCiE9Nnsc3g4JQrCe8ZQVzOdS4q4ApdGjKX1Ko8Q4tF2D8/iQ3jhJdaqlMkyv hbRlGDkSWNIfU3+Krh/5jf8MA+gfg8otzQOQjIuOQ2+yndyOXGOI0+gySJahIXe+ MwsFNxVBunQTYYPM4pEcbFvkruaN/P3mECmALCwqHIQIFqWtsW8cE8W9JWmHyrUZ i9VoayZjjyOEmBs8YEd7Th3QcJq+jwhjpFjsssG8yQBUQmgytoDVghYiZoJ+NBAR aTlRYqfEmzuOmr8uDrBUlvtlLBRhzT9yGrrXt+h1Ikz1pkgUZj1l/9BVxgyjiiUN +F/5QC0Hx8XeGm7nq+vvBn16xlVyhxxn2NdY6vFPLEWhObxSxwKAYgxWBSQA+obt RSl1LMH5Tm8MkFBWXzU08ZhSh6bo3ASfzV+9QJEXSqjZAMRuHq3oJ2HG0lf9hZm/ az9ScOg9KzEMox/staE3kfhjPaddNUypR+bK7VYXY13EuAjNpOUfWlOGF3c6lA2L 2SNwVPtSMh6x1ixpBzWEgfk39RBfCiye3tdhJ5QIeUv9t9G/2HBJ+jasgDkcsfsG odhsgU2DjN/fIA/xohJ9CApqLVFOBYciwyWa0lJsICOyvq/Zf+v4BLX3wp8ro9E2 CWiR =n/k5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Matheus Polkorny <mpolkorny@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-14 02:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <M1Jpf-2GAH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1271055 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, ufomerge is now in the Debian NEW queue, waiting for the review process - https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html -- Thanks, Polkorny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-01-23 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Mgqul-cHHF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1274304 |
I've been looking at this package, you can see its review status at https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/python-notobuilder This package depends on at least 3 package not currently in Debian: python3-chevron, python3-diffenator2, python3-gftools-, python3-ufomerge. Why is that? Are those dependencies an oversight or intentional? Note that python3-gftools- looks suspicious, can you please clarify why that is? I note that the debian/ packaging is under a different license than the actual package. Usually the packaging follows the usptream license for simpliciy. What's the reason for diverging here? Thanks, -rt
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web