Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1270643 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-11-18 11:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2025-11-19 04:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1111958: calamares-extensions: Remove package. Upstream is dropping development Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2025-11-18 11:50 +0100
Bug#1111958: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#1111958: calamares-extensions: Remove package. Upstream is dropping development undef <debian@undef.tools> - 2025-11-19 04:20 +0100
| From | Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-18 11:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#1111958: calamares-extensions: Remove package. Upstream is dropping development |
| Message-ID | <LSrrz-dRH4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Can you please explain in more detail why you think the calamares-extensions package is now included in calamares? The provided URLs do not support this claim. New upstream is https://codeberg.org/Calamares/calamares-extensions
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | undef <debian@undef.tools> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-19 04:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#1111958: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#1111958: calamares-extensions: Remove package. Upstream is dropping development |
| Message-ID | <LSGTG-e2cN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1270643 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
> Can you please explain in more detail why you think the > calamares-extensions package is now included in calamares? My read of the comment on Issue 33 above was that it would be integrated into the main `calamares` package, however, this doesn't seem to have taken place. In saying that, I'd certainly agree with the "no longer supported" part and won't disagree with removing it. At least the mobile component hasn't been functional for well over a year, with little support upstream for fixing it. I also don't believe anything outside of the Mobian installer depends on it, and that isn't currently functional either.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web