Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1253132 > unrolled thread

Bug#1109453: unblock: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp/1.11.1-2

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

Contents

  Bug#1109453: unblock: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp/1.11.1-2 Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> - 2025-07-18 11:30 +0200
    Bug#1109453: unblock: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp/1.11.1-2 Ivo De Decker <ivodd@debian.org> - 2025-07-19 15:00 +0200
      Bug#1109453: unblock: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp/1.11.1-2 Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> - 2025-07-19 23:30 +0200
        Bug#1109453: unblock: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp/1.11.1-2 Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2025-07-20 10:30 +0200
          Bug#1109453: unblock: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp/1.11.1-2 Jochen Sprickerhof <jochen@sprickerhof.de> - 2025-07-20 12:10 +0200
            Bug#1109453: unblock: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp/1.11.1-2 Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2025-07-20 12:10 +0200

#1253132 — Bug#1109453: unblock: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp/1.11.1-2

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp@packages.debian.org, holger@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp

[ Reason ]
Does not build with the nocheck build profile.

[ Impact ]
None

[ Tests ]
It builds.

[ Risks ]
None

[ Checklist ]
  [X] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [X] attach debdiff against the package in testing

[ Other info ]
This is fine. This is basically just a

sed -i 's/ <!nocheck>//' debian/control

unblock rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp/1.11.1-2

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1253262

control: tags -1 moreinfo

Hi Jochen,

On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 11:24:16AM +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> [ Other info ]
> This is fine. This is basically just a
> 
> sed -i 's/ <!nocheck>//' debian/control

There is 1 nocheck left:

librust-vergen-8+git2-dev <!nocheck>

I guess the sed didn't catch that one.

Is this intentional?

Cheers,

Ivo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1253311

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

control: tags -1 - moreinfo

* Ivo De Decker <ivodd@debian.org> [2025-07-19 12:50]:
>On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 11:24:16AM +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
>> [ Other info ]
>> This is fine. This is basically just a
>>
>> sed -i 's/ <!nocheck>//' debian/control
>
>There is 1 nocheck left:
>
>librust-vergen-8+git2-dev <!nocheck>
>
>I guess the sed didn't catch that one.
>
>Is this intentional?

Not sure if intentional (Holger would know) but it is not important for 
the bug. I just ran

sbuild --profiles=nocheck rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp -d unstable

and it compiles fine and that was all Helmut was asking for in the bug.

Cheers Jochen

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1253333

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Not sure if intentional (Holger would know) but it is not important for the
> bug. I just ran
> sbuild --profiles=nocheck rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp -d unstable
> and it compiles fine and that was all Helmut was asking for in the bug.

thanks for confirming it's not a problem, however it was unintended and I do
plan another upload to clean this up today.


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

I miss the old days were billionaires’ vanity projects were to build 1000 public
libraries or giant music venues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1253345

Am 20. Juli 2025 10:25:53 MESZ schrieb Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>:
>thanks for confirming it's not a problem, however it was unintended and I do
>plan another upload to clean this up today.

That would actually be contra productive. We want those nocheck annotations as long as the package builds so removing them is wrong.

Cheers Jochen

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1253346

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

control: retitle -1 unblock: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp/1.11.1-3
thanks

On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 11:51:36AM +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> That would actually be contra productive. We want those nocheck annotations as long as the package builds so removing them is wrong.

I'm sorry I've only see this after uploading 1.11.1-3.

However I also disagree, that line was ment to be removed in the -2
upload already and we want to revisit this for forky anyway and add
as many nocheck lines as possible.


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

Right-handed people commit 90% of all crime world-wide.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist

csiph-web