Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1251691 > unrolled thread

Bug#1108679: unblock: libvirt/11.3.0-3

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

Contents

  Bug#1108679: unblock: libvirt/11.3.0-3 Andrea Bolognani <eof@kiyuko.org> - 2025-07-02 22:50 +0200
    Bug#1108679: unblock: libvirt/11.3.0-3 Ivo De Decker <ivodd@debian.org> - 2025-07-03 14:50 +0200
      Bug#1108679: unblock: libvirt/11.3.0-3 Andrea Bolognani <eof@kiyuko.org> - 2025-07-03 21:20 +0200
    Bug#1108679: unblock: libvirt/11.3.0-3 Andrea Bolognani <eof@kiyuko.org> - 2025-07-05 18:40 +0200

#1251691 — Bug#1108679: unblock: libvirt/11.3.0-3

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: libvirt@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libvirt

Please unblock package libvirt

[ Reason ]

Backport fix for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2369243

The issue has not been filed against Debian, but it affects the
version of libvirt in trixie nonetheless.

[ Tests ]

I have manually tested the fix and confirmed that it addresses the
issue.

[ Risks ]

Very little risk of causing regressions. The fix is small and
targeted, and it comes directly from upstream with no changes.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing

unblock libvirt/11.3.0-3

-- 
Andrea Bolognani <eof@kiyuko.org>
Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1251739

Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 10:43:26PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Subject: unblock: libvirt/11.3.0-3

> Please unblock package libvirt

This version doesn't seem to be uploaded to unstable. In case this unblock
requests was meant as a pre-approval request:

Please go ahead with the upload and remove the moreinfo tag from this unblock
request once the new upload has been in unstable for a few days, and you think
it's ready to migrate.

Thanks,

Ivo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1251771

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 12:40:14PM +0000, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 10:43:26PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Subject: unblock: libvirt/11.3.0-3
> 
> > Please unblock package libvirt
> 
> This version doesn't seem to be uploaded to unstable. In case this unblock
> requests was meant as a pre-approval request:

Yes, that was the idea. I was under the impression that pre-approvals
were preferred, but if that's not the case I can start with the
upload next time. Or maybe I should have just mentioned this :)

> Please go ahead with the upload and remove the moreinfo tag from this unblock
> request once the new upload has been in unstable for a few days, and you think
> it's ready to migrate.

Upload done. I'll remove the tag in a few days.

Thanks!

-- 
Andrea Bolognani <eof@kiyuko.org>
Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1251923

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sat, Jul 05, 2025 at 03:17:51PM +0000, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 09:07:05PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 12:40:14PM +0000, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > > This version doesn't seem to be uploaded to unstable. In case this unblock
> > > requests was meant as a pre-approval request:
> > 
> > Yes, that was the idea. I was under the impression that pre-approvals
> > were preferred, but if that's not the case I can start with the
> > upload next time. Or maybe I should have just mentioned this :)
> 
> Well, people usually mention that it's a pre-approval request.

Yeah, it's completely obvious in retrospect. My bad for not
mentioning it. I'll make sure not to make the same mistake in the
future.

> If the change is a small targeted fix that can easily be reverted if
> necessary, then there isn't much risk in a direct upload. If the change is
> bigger, not in line with the freeze policy, or if a revert would be
> inconvenient, it might be better to ask for pre-approval.

Makes sense. Personally I'd rather not upload anything to unstable if
there's a (foreseeable) chance that it will have to be reverted, so
the pre-approval approach still suits me better.

> > > Please go ahead with the upload and remove the moreinfo tag from this unblock
> > > request once the new upload has been in unstable for a few days, and you think
> > > it's ready to migrate.
> > 
> > Upload done. I'll remove the tag in a few days.
> 
> Unblocked.

Thank you!

-- 
Andrea Bolognani <eof@kiyuko.org>
Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist

csiph-web