Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1250651 > unrolled thread

Bug#1108137: bookworm-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.40-1.1

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

Contents

  Bug#1108137: bookworm-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.40-1.1 Andreas Metzler <ametzler@bebt.de> - 2025-06-21 11:10 +0200
    Bug#1108137: bookworm-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.40-1.1 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2025-06-21 12:30 +0200
      Bug#1108137: bookworm-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.40-1.1 Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2025-06-22 00:30 +0200
        Bug#1108137: bookworm-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.40-1.1 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2025-06-22 12:20 +0200
    Bug#1108137: gnupg2 2.2.40-1.1+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance Adam D Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2025-06-21 18:00 +0200

#1250651 — Bug#1108137: bookworm-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.40-1.1

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
X-Debbugs-Cc: gnupg2@packages.debian.org, "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Control: affects -1 + src:gnupg2
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hello,

gnupg2 in bookworm is not binNMU safe, with e.g. 
Package: gpg-agent
Architecture: any
Recommends:
 gnupg (= ${binary:Version}),

and gnupg being Architecture: all.

This has already been fixed in sid about a year ago, a recent stable
binNMU has shown this to be a real problem there, too.
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-gnupg-maint/2025-June/010226.html

cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1250659

Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Sat, 2025-06-21 at 10:59 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> gnupg2 in bookworm is not binNMU safe, with e.g. 
> Package: gpg-agent
> Architecture: any
> Recommends:
>  gnupg (= ${binary:Version}),
> 
> and gnupg being Architecture: all.
> 
> This has already been fixed in sid about a year ago, a recent stable
> binNMU has shown this to be a real problem there, too.
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-gnupg-maint/2025-June/010226.html

Please go ahead; thanks.

Regards,

Adam

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1250715

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2025-06-21):
> On Sat, 2025-06-21 at 10:59 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > gnupg2 in bookworm is not binNMU safe, with e.g. 
> > Package: gpg-agent
> > Architecture: any
> > Recommends:
> >  gnupg (= ${binary:Version}),
> > 
> > and gnupg being Architecture: all.
> > 
> > This has already been fixed in sid about a year ago, a recent stable
> > binNMU has shown this to be a real problem there, too.
> > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-gnupg-maint/2025-June/010226.html
> 
> Please go ahead; thanks.

For completeness, diffoscoping the amd64 gpgv-udeb binary, no changes
except for timestamps and build IDs, so no cause for worries there.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1250736

On Sun, 2025-06-22 at 00:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2025-06-21):
> > On Sat, 2025-06-21 at 10:59 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > gnupg2 in bookworm is not binNMU safe, with e.g. 
> > > Package: gpg-agent
> > > Architecture: any
> > > Recommends:
> > >  gnupg (= ${binary:Version}),
> > > 
> > > and gnupg being Architecture: all.
> > > 
> > > This has already been fixed in sid about a year ago, a recent
> > > stable
> > > binNMU has shown this to be a real problem there, too.
> > > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-gnupg-maint/2025-June/010226.html
> > 
> > Please go ahead; thanks.
> 
> For completeness, diffoscoping the amd64 gpgv-udeb binary, no changes
> except for timestamps and build IDs, so no cause for worries there.

I didn't expect there would be, but thanks for checking and confirming.

Regards,

Adam

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1250691 — Bug#1108137: gnupg2 2.2.40-1.1+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

package release.debian.org
tags 1108137 = bookworm pending
thanks

Hi,

The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.

Thanks for your contribution!

Upload details
==============

Package: gnupg2
Version: 2.2.40-1.1+deb12u1

Explanation: fix recommends of architecture-any packages on architecture-all package to support binNMUs

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist

csiph-web