Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1242737 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Macy Lin <macy@debconf.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-04-19 20:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2025-04-20 21:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1057763: Macy Lin <macy@debconf.org> - 2025-04-19 20:00 +0200
Bug#1057763: qt5-style-kvantum: add Qt 6 build ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czchen@debconf.org> - 2025-04-20 17:10 +0200
Bug#1057763: qt5-style-kvantum: add Qt 6 build Vladimir K <pzs-fs@yandex.ru> - 2025-04-20 18:20 +0200
Bug#1057763: qt5-style-kvantum: add Qt 6 build Leandro Cunha <leandrocunha016@gmail.com> - 2025-04-20 21:00 +0200
| From | Macy Lin <macy@debconf.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-19 20:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1057763: |
| Message-ID | <KDkDT-eLQ6-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi, I saw kvantum source package already builds qt6-style-kvantum in testing. And it has an RC bug #1102936 that has an undeclared file conflicts. Do we still need to have both qt5-style-kvantum and kvantum packages? Or we can remove qt5-style-kvantum to solve the undeclared file conflicts? Best regards, Macy
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czchen@debconf.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-20 17:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1057763: qt5-style-kvantum: add Qt 6 build |
| Message-ID | <KDEsV-eYQa-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1242737 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 07:55:34PM +0200, Macy Lin wrote:
> Do we still need to have both qt5-style-kvantum and kvantum packages?
> Or we can remove qt5-style-kvantum to solve the undeclared file conflicts?
materia-kde, and arc-kde still depend on qt5-style-kvantum, we need to
migrate them first so that we can remove qt5-style-kvantum.
--
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debian}.org
Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vladimir K <pzs-fs@yandex.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-20 18:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1057763: qt5-style-kvantum: add Qt 6 build |
| Message-ID | <KDFyF-eZuw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1242850 |
There are still lots of Qt5 apps in Debian. Qt5 style is still needed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Leandro Cunha <leandrocunha016@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-20 21:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1057763: qt5-style-kvantum: add Qt 6 build |
| Message-ID | <KDI3v-f0Rn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1242850 |
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 12:02 PM ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czchen@debconf.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 07:55:34PM +0200, Macy Lin wrote: > > Do we still need to have both qt5-style-kvantum and kvantum packages? > > Or we can remove qt5-style-kvantum to solve the undeclared file conflicts? > > materia-kde, and arc-kde still depend on qt5-style-kvantum, we need to > migrate them first so that we can remove qt5-style-kvantum. > > > Hello! All the work on arc-kde to be compatible with Plasma 6 was done in https://github.com/PapirusDevelopmentTeam/arc-kde/pull/145 with patches brought via git cherry-pick (https://git-scm.com/docs/git-cherry-pick) to the Debian package that Boyuan worked on. Would have to test it with kvantum in qt6 to be sure how it works. materia-kde has been removed from testing and is only present in unstable and may be removed in the future. -- Cheers, Leandro Cunha
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web