Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1242646 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stanislav Maslovski <stanislav.maslovski@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-04-18 23:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2025-04-19 06:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1082512: Ping (Was: Bug#1082512: ITS: kbdd) Stanislav Maslovski <stanislav.maslovski@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 23:40 +0200
Bug#1082512: Ping (Was: Bug#1082512: ITS: kbdd) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2025-04-19 06:40 +0200
| From | Stanislav Maslovski <stanislav.maslovski@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-18 23:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1082512: Ping (Was: Bug#1082512: ITS: kbdd) |
| Message-ID | <KD1Bf-ewL4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Andreas, I would like to ask you to close this ITS bug (or I will close it myself if you do not). I've picked up from what you did for kbdd package. Your changes are now reflected and acknowledged in my repository here: https://salsa.debian.org/smaslovski/kbdd Please note that I've tested the 0.7.1 version of kbdd on my Debian install and found that it does not work as it should. Namely, in this version there is a bug with loosing layout group when switching focus between windows (http://bugs.debian.org/#644661). Long ago, I fixed this bug in version 0.6-4 with the patch "group-lost-on-focus-change-fix" that you had to disable when upgrading the pkg source to the last upstream release. Unfortunately, there had been many changes upstream that made this fix incompatible with the version 0.7.1. When time permits, I will look into porting this patch to the latest version. Meanwhile, trixie will have to be released with the older, but fully functional version of kbdd. Please also note that at this moment kbdd is effectively abandoned upstream: https://github.com/qnikst/kbdd/issues/52 This means that whoever wants to maintain this package will have to fix bugs himself. Perhaps, you were not prepared for this, as you even did not test if the newer version of the program worked as expected. With best regards, Stanislav On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 04:13:13PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Stanislav, > > friendly ping for this. Did you checked out the repository for kbdd > > https://salsa.debian.org/salvage-team/kbdd > > ? Do you want me to move it to debian/ team space and grant you > permissions on the repository? > > Kind regards > Andreas. > > Am Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 08:10:25PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > Dear Stanislav, > > > > Am Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 09:55:32AM +0100 schrieb Stanislav Maslovski: > > > Dear Andreas, > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 01:15:08PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > I've set up a repository within the salvage-team space[2] to assist you > > > > with this initial setup. If you decide not to accept the ITS, this > > > > repository can easily be moved to another location, such as debian/, or > > > > any place of your choosing. I hope this service helps make the > > > > transition to using a Git repository on Salsa smoother and more > > > > convenient for you. > > > > > > Regarding transitioning to Salsa: I've just created an account on > > > Salsa, however, it is deactivated by now, because it needs an approval > > > from the administrator. I will wait until this is done, because it > > > seems that using Salsa is the easiest way to incorporate your changes > > > into the package. > > > > Just take your time. We can sort out things in the next couple of > > days. > > > > > One more thing to note: probably, if you had started with an NMU, that > > > would be easier to work with. > > > > I'd prefer to make you comfortable with the workflow on Salsa. There > > is no urgent reason for an NMU. You can decide freely where to move > > it on Salsa. It might make sense to use the debian "Team". > > > > Just let me know once your account is active and I'll grant you > > permissions for the repository. > > > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > > > -- > > https://fam-tille.de > > -- > https://fam-tille.de -- Stanislav Maslovski
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-19 06:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KD89H-eCaL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1242646 |
Hi Stanislav,
Am Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:34:57PM +0100 schrieb Stanislav Maslovski:
> I would like to ask you to close this ITS bug (or I will close it
> myself if you do not).
Its perfectly fine if you close the bug. I noticed that your changelog
in Git does this. Great, this is actually the best way to close the
bug. For the moment this bug serves as a way to document the status of
this package. If you might like to include your insight you wrote below
in some debian/README.source (in your next upload) this might be of
extra value.
> I've picked up from what you did for kbdd package. Your changes
> are now reflected and acknowledged in my repository here:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/smaslovski/kbdd
I'm really happy you acknowledge the packaging fixes which seems to show
that its successful to pool your insight into the code with some
packaging help the Salvage team intends to provide.
> Please note that I've tested the 0.7.1 version of kbdd on my Debian
> install and found that it does not work as it should. Namely, in this
> version there is a bug with loosing layout group when switching focus
> between windows (http://bugs.debian.org/#644661). Long ago, I fixed this
> bug in version 0.6-4 with the patch "group-lost-on-focus-change-fix" that
> you had to disable when upgrading the pkg source to the last upstream
> release.
>
> Unfortunately, there had been many changes upstream that made this fix
> incompatible with the version 0.7.1. When time permits, I will look into
> porting this patch to the latest version. Meanwhile, trixie will have to be
> released with the older, but fully functional version of kbdd.
Its perfectly correct that Trixi should be released with what is now
in testing.
> Please also note that at this moment kbdd is effectively abandoned
> upstream: https://github.com/qnikst/kbdd/issues/52 This means that
> whoever wants to maintain this package will have to fix bugs himself.
> Perhaps, you were not prepared for this, as you even did not test
> if the newer version of the program worked as expected.
Just to clarify the intention of the package Salvage team: We do by no
means intend to take away packages from maintainers who are actively
caring for their packages. My upload in October last year was a pure
mistake and I'd like to apologize again for this. I'm more than happy
if you care for the package.
> With best regards,
Same here and thank you for creating the repository on Salsa
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web