Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1242029 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-04-14 20:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2025-04-25 09:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 6 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
Bug#1103162: nmu: coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> - 2025-04-14 20:00 +0200
Bug#1103162: nmu: coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2025-04-15 08:50 +0200
Bug#1103162: nmu: coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> - 2025-04-15 17:20 +0200
Bug#1103162: nmu: coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2025-04-17 08:50 +0200
Bug#1103162: nmu: coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> - 2025-04-17 23:30 +0200
Bug#1103162: nmu: coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> - 2025-04-25 09:00 +0200
| From | Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-14 20:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1103162: nmu: coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 |
| Message-ID | <KBwg9-dvyF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against librdkit-dev"
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-15 08:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KBIhj-dDSA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1242029 |
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2025-04-14 19:49:00 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > nmu coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against librdkit-dev" Why is this needed? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-15 17:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KBQeR-dJn0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1242117 |
Hi, On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 08:40:59AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2025-04-14 19:49:00 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: binnmu > > > > nmu coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against librdkit-dev" > > Why is this needed? The autopkgtests fail: https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/coot/testing/amd64/ https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/coot/testing/amd64/59906919/ Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-17 08:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KCrep-e7p1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1242163 |
On 2025-04-15 17:10:44 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 08:40:59AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > On 2025-04-14 19:49:00 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: binnmu > > > > > > nmu coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against librdkit-dev" > > > > Why is this needed? > > The autopkgtests fail: > > https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/coot/testing/amd64/ > https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/coot/testing/amd64/59906919/ If symbols go missing from librdkit, this smells like a SONAME bump that is missing from librdkit. Why did this symbol disappear? Best Sebastian -- Sebastian Ramacher
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-17 23:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KCEY1-egoG-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1242410 |
Hi, On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 08:41:35AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2025-04-15 17:10:44 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 08:40:59AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > > > On 2025-04-14 19:49:00 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > Severity: normal > > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > > > Usertags: binnmu > > > > > > > > nmu coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against librdkit-dev" > > > > > > Why is this needed? > > > > The autopkgtests fail: > > > > https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/coot/testing/amd64/ > > https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/coot/testing/amd64/59906919/ > > If symbols go missing from librdkit, this smells like a SONAME bump that > is missing from librdkit. Right. But coot is the only reverse-depdency, and I think it is ok to rebuild it for trixie and then re-assess the situation post-trixie. E.g. we could remove the shared library. > Why did this symbol disappear? Because upstream is playing loose with the library API I guess and/or do not care all that much. It is nothing new with scientific packages and a reason I mostly only ship -dev libraries anymore. Should we rename the shared library package to librdkit1d or something instead? Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-25 09:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KFlcu-g5Dm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1242029 |
Hi, On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:05:33PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:50:15 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> > wrote: > > > Right. But coot is the only reverse-depdency, and I think it is ok to > > > rebuild it for trixie and then re-assess the situation post-trixie. E.g. > > > we could remove the shared library. > > > > It is not ideal, but scheduled the rebuild. Please make sure that > > librdkit1t64 gains a Breaks on the old version of coot. > > This still needs to happen. As I scheduled the autopkgtest combination to > quickly in reply to bug 1103579 (which was CC-ed to the RT) rdkit is now > blocked by an explicit block hint by me. Please let us know when the Breaks > is added. I've just uploaded rdkit_202503.1-3 with a Breaks: coot (<< 1.1.15+dfsg-1) for librdkit1t64. Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web