Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1242130 > unrolled thread

Bug#1099646: transition: gnat

Started byGraham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
First post2025-04-15 12:30 +0200
Last post2025-04-27 13:20 +0200
Articles 5 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Bug#1099646: transition: gnat Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2025-04-15 12:30 +0200
    Bug#1099646: transition: gnat Nicolas Boulenguez <nicolas@debian.org> - 2025-04-15 17:50 +0200
      Bug#1099646: transition: gnat Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2025-04-26 14:50 +0200
        Bug#1099646: transition: gnat Nicolas Boulenguez <nicolas@debian.org> - 2025-04-26 17:10 +0200
          Bug#1099646: transition: gnat Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2025-04-27 13:20 +0200

#1242130 — Bug#1099646: transition: gnat

FromGraham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
Date2025-04-15 12:30 +0200
SubjectBug#1099646: transition: gnat
Message-ID<KBLId-dGar-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Nicolas

On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 at 16:18, Nicolas Boulenguez <nicolas@debian.org> wrote:
> Should I upload gprbuild despite the freeze, or wait for first dot
> release?  In the first case, should I wait after this bug is closed
> and open a distinct one? do an intermediate upload to experimental?

Please go ahead and upload gprbuild build directly to unstable.

I'll follow up with the binNMUs.

Regards
Graham

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1242167

FromNicolas Boulenguez <nicolas@debian.org>
Date2025-04-15 17:50 +0200
Message-ID<KBQHT-dJxT-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1242130
> Please go ahead and upload gprbuild build directly to unstable.
> I'll follow up with the binNMUs.

Great!
Gprbuild/2025.0.0-4 passes its autopkgtests on salsa.
It is built and uploaded to unstable on several architectures.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1243687

FromGraham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
Date2025-04-26 14:50 +0200
Message-ID<KFN8J-gogk-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1242167
Hi Nicolas

I have prepared two variations of the gnat-14 tracker.

The first [1], has

is_bad = !.depends ~ /libgnat-14/;

instead of

is_bad = .depends ~ /libgnat/ & !.depends ~ /libgnat-14/;

but this has even more packages in the 'unknown' state (there are
matches for both is_good and is_bad).

The second [2], has

is_bad = .depends ~ /libgnat-\d+/ & !.depends ~ /libgnat-14/;

and this looks good to me.  We could simply have used

is_bad = .depends ~ /libgnat-13/;

here instead, but I also want to catch packages that still depend on
any older libgnat-12, libgnat-11, etc.

Please let me know what you think.

Regards
Graham


[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnat-14-v2.html
[2] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnat-14-v3.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1243695

FromNicolas Boulenguez <nicolas@debian.org>
Date2025-04-26 17:10 +0200
Message-ID<KFPkd-gpOf-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1243687
Hello.
The package list generated by v3 looks correct.
I agree that older libraries, if any, should also be reported.
Thanks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1243812

FromGraham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
Date2025-04-27 13:20 +0200
Message-ID<KG8db-gCoj-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1243695
Hi Nicolas

On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 at 15:04, Nicolas Boulenguez <nicolas@debian.org> wrote:
> The package list generated by v3 looks correct.
> I agree that older libraries, if any, should also be reported.

Thanks for confirming!  I've committed the change to the gnat-14
tracker, and moved it to 'old' so we can re-use it for the next
transition.

Regards
Graham

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist

csiph-web