Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1214855 > unrolled thread

Bug#1083126: Should octave-database be removed from unstable?

Started byHelmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>
First post2024-10-02 06:50 +0200
Last post2024-10-02 08:40 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist


Contents

  Bug#1083126: Should octave-database be removed from unstable? Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2024-10-02 06:50 +0200
    Bug#1083126: Should octave-database be removed from unstable? Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2024-10-02 08:40 +0200
    Bug#1083126: Should octave-database be removed from unstable? Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2024-10-02 08:40 +0200

#1214855 — Bug#1083126: Should octave-database be removed from unstable?

FromHelmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>
Date2024-10-02 06:50 +0200
SubjectBug#1083126: Should octave-database be removed from unstable?
Message-ID<JsZtf-glYn-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Source: octave-database
Severity: important
User: helmutg@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove

Dear maintainer,

I suggest removing octave-database from Debian for the following reasons:
 * It accumulated one RC-bug:
   + #1004158: octave: autopkgtest regression on armhf
     Last modified: 2 years

 * It is not part of bookworm or trixie and is not a key package.

This bug serves as a pre-removal warning. After one month, the bug will be
reassigned to ftp.debian.org to actually request removal of the package.

In case the package should be kept in unstable, please evaluate each of the
RC-bugs listed above.
 * If the bug is meant to permanently prevent the package from entering testing
   or a stable release, but this package should stay part of unstable, please
   add a usertag:

       user helmutg@debian.org
       usertags NNN + sidremove-ignore

 * If the bug no longer applies, please close it. If it is closed, check
   whether the fixed version is correct and adjust if necessary.

 * Is the bug really release-critical? If not, please downgrade.

 * If the bug still applies, please send a status update at least once a year.

Once all of the mentioned RC bugs have been acted upon in one way or another,
please close this bug.

In case the package should be removed from unstable, you may reassign this
bug report:

    Control: severity -1 normal
    Control: retitle -1 RM: octave-database -- RoM; rc-buggy
    Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
    Control: affects -1 + src:octave-database

Alternatively, you may wait a month and have it reassigned.

In case you disagree with the above, please add a wontfix tag to this bug.

    Control: tags -1 + wontfix

Doing so will also prevent automatic reassignment.

Kind regards

A tool for automatically removing packages from unstable

This bug report has been automatically filed with little human intervention.
If the filing is unclear or in error, don't hesitate to contact
Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> for assistance.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1214864

FromHelmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>
Date2024-10-02 08:40 +0200
Message-ID<Jt1bI-gn3z-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1214855
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 RM: octave-database -- RoM; rc-buggy
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:octave-database

On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 08:30:49AM +0200, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> Please, go ahead and remove the package from unstable. It seems pretty dead
> upstream and I cannot even build the package with the latest version of
> PostgreSQL in unstable.

Thanks for confirming.

Helmut

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1214865

FromRafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org>
Date2024-10-02 08:40 +0200
Message-ID<Jt1bI-gn3z-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1214855
* Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> [2024-10-02 04:36]:

> Source: octave-database
> Severity: important
> User: helmutg@debian.org
> Usertags: sidremove
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I suggest removing octave-database from Debian for the following reasons: 
> * It accumulated one RC-bug: 
>   + #1004158: octave: autopkgtest regression on armhf 
>     Last modified: 2 years
>
> * It is not part of bookworm or trixie and is not a key package.
>
> This bug serves as a pre-removal warning. After one month, the bug will be 
> reassigned to ftp.debian.org to actually request removal of the package.

Please, go ahead and remove the package from unstable. It seems pretty 
dead upstream and I cannot even build the package with the latest 
version of PostgreSQL in unstable.

Thanks,

Rafael Laboissière

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web