Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1211411 > unrolled thread

Bug#1080439: transition: exiv2 0.28.x

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

Contents

  Bug#1080439: transition: exiv2 0.28.x Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org> - 2024-09-04 07:30 +0200
    Bug#1080439: transition: exiv2 0.28.x Andreas Metzler <ametzler@bebt.de> - 2024-09-09 20:00 +0200
    Bug#1080439: [SPAM] Bug#1080439: transition: exiv2 0.28.x Andreas Metzler <ametzler@bebt.de> - 2024-09-25 18:40 +0200
    Bug#1080439: [SPAM] Bug#1080439: transition: exiv2 0.28.x Andreas Metzler <ametzler@bebt.de> - 2024-09-28 07:00 +0200

#1211411 — Bug#1080439: transition: exiv2 0.28.x

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: exiv2@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:exiv2
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

I'd like to request a transition for the current stable version of the
Exiv2 library, i.e. 0.28.x (currently 0.28.3).

There were changes in "core" parts of the API, which required changes
in a large number of the users. At this point, basically almost all the
users have been fixed either upstream or downstream, so I think it is
finally time to introduce the new version, more than one year after the
release of 0.28.0.

In addition to the SONAME bump, the update to 0.28.x also splits the
translation files form the libexiv2-X package to a new libexiv2-data:
this means that libexiv2-27 (0.27.x) and libexiv2-28 (0.28.x) are not
coinstallable.

There are almost 40 users of Exiv2 in unstable, and at the time of this
writing almost all of them build fine with 0.28.x; the exceptions are:
- hdrmerge -- FTBFS reported as #1071027
- lomiri-gallery-app -- FTBFS reported as #1076761
- nomacs -- request to upload a new version filed as #1076763

Regarding hdrmerge & lomiri-gallery-app: I created delayed NMUs for them
that will hit in about 14 days. Regardless, they are leaf packages, so
they should not block this transition.

Regarding nomacs: it is not currently in unstable, so it will not block
the migration to testing.

Also worth noting gpscorrelate: it builds fine with 0.28.x, however
it is out of testing because of autopkgtest failures (see #1076775);
this means it can be still rebuilt with the new version.

Hence, I believe this transition should be good to go now, and I do not
see other open RC bugs for the affected packages that would block this.
I tested the rebuilds only on amd64, so in case issues on other
architectures show up, I will take a look during the transition.

Ben file:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-exiv2.html

title = "exiv2";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libexiv2\-27" | .depends ~ "libexiv2\-28|libexiv2\-data";
is_good = .depends ~ "libexiv2\-28|libexiv2\-data";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libexiv2\-27";

Thanks,
-- 
Pino

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1212079

In article <b3b7345f-9033-4790-8ec3-f8ba0cecfdb1__20224.3769120955$1725527019$gmane$org@gmail.com> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.release) you wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed

> On 04/09/2024 07:17, Pino Toscano wrote:
>> Usertags: transition
[...]
,

>> I'd like to request a transition for the current stable version of the
>> Exiv2 library, i.e. 0.28.x (currently 0.28.3).
[...]

Hello,

I have uploaded hugin about an hour ago and was too slow with "dcut
rm". I hope it does not mess up things too badly. Afaict it shouldn't,
the only new thing it adds is libvigraimpex which should propagate to
testing tomorrow anyway.

cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1214245 — Bug#1080439: [SPAM] Bug#1080439: transition: exiv2 0.28.x

On 2024-09-19 Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> exiv2 has been trying to migrate for two weeks now, it's going to need
> some help.

> I don't understand the reasons given in the britney update_output. Did
> the gexiv2 binNMU break the dependencies on it in testing?

Hello,

Afaiui every rdep would need to be ready for migration to testing at the
same time. Which probably has not never been the case, e.g. currently
geeqie is too young. Nevertheless I suspect that transition is too big
to be happen without help/force.

cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1214488 — Bug#1080439: [SPAM] Bug#1080439: transition: exiv2 0.28.x

On 2024-09-26 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> wrote:
> On 25-09-2024 18:26, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Afaiui every rdep would need to be ready for migration to testing at the
>> same time. Which probably has not never been the case, e.g. currently
>> geeqie is too young. Nevertheless I suspect that transition is too big
>> to be happen without help/force.

> I've added a hint. Let's hope that the next few hours no new package
> appears.

Good morning Paul,

that seems to have worked. Thank you!

cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist

csiph-web