Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1212796 > unrolled thread

Bug#1081711: pfm: was succeeded by PostSqlForms (psf)

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

Contents

  Bug#1081711: pfm: was succeeded by PostSqlForms (psf) Ben Tris <benattris@gezapig.nl> - 2024-09-14 09:10 +0200
    Bug#1081711: pfm: was succeeded by PostSqlForms (psf) Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org> - 2024-09-22 10:00 +0200

#1212796 — Bug#1081711: pfm: was succeeded by PostSqlForms (psf)

Source: pfm
Version: 2.0.8-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

psf
Last version AFAIK was v1.04 feb-2014.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/postsqlforms/
https://postsqlforms.sourceforge.net/en/index.html

pfm
https://web.archive.org/web/20191221111328/http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pfm/
https://web.archive.org/web/20170213185557/http://pfm.projects.pgfoundry.org/


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.7
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-25-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1213923

Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: severity -1 wishlist

On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 09:03:27 +0200 Ben Tris <benattris@gezapig.nl>
wrote:
> Source: pfm
> Version: 2.0.8-3
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> psf
> Last version AFAIK was v1.04 feb-2014.
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/postsqlforms/
> https://postsqlforms.sourceforge.net/en/index.html
> 
> pfm
>
https://web.archive.org/web/20191221111328/http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pfm/
>
https://web.archive.org/web/20170213185557/http://pfm.projects.pgfoundry.org/
> 

Can you elaborate what the purpose of this bug is?

If you want psf to be packaged this should be a RFP bug against the wnpp
pseudo package.

If you think pfm should be retired, and replaced by psf, you should do
the RFP thing and explain at least (in this bug) if pfm/psf are
compatible and what to be done to replace it.

If you think psf should be retired, but not replaced, you should explain
that too. 
(FTR, psf has no reverse dependencies, so it could be easily removed
from Debian. popcon is quite low, around 40, so it is probably not in
wide use too)

--
tobi

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist

csiph-web