Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1210925 > unrolled thread

Bug#1080175: ITS: funnelweb

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

Contents

  Bug#1080175: ITS: funnelweb Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2024-08-31 07:30 +0200
    Bug#1080175: ITS: funnelweb Ben Tris <benattris@gezapig.nl> - 2024-09-13 13:20 +0200
    Bug#1080175: funnelweb (3.2-6) uploaded to DELAYED=10 Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2024-09-22 22:20 +0200
      Bug#929866: Bug#1080175: funnelweb (3.2-6) uploaded to DELAYED=10 Yann Dirson <ydirson@free.fr> - 2024-09-23 00:00 +0200
        Bug#1080175: funnelweb (3.2-6) uploaded to DELAYED=10 Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2024-09-23 08:40 +0200

#1210925 — Bug#1080175: ITS: funnelweb

Source: funnelweb
Version: 3.2-5
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>, 929866@bugs.debian.org, Package Salvaging Team <team+salvage@tracker.debian.org>

Hi

I’m interested in salvaging your package, funnelweb, in accordance with
the Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference[1].
Your package meets the criteria for this process, and I would love to
assist in preserving and maintaining it. As the Salvage process
suggests, here is a list of the criteria that apply, in my opinion:

  - NMUs, especially if there has been more than one NMU in a row.
  - Bugs filed against the package do not have answers from the
    maintainer.
  - There are QA issues with the package.

I’ve set up a repository within the salvage-team space[2] to assist you
with this initial setup. If you decide not to accept the ITS, this
repository can easily be moved to another location, such as debian/, or
any place of your choosing. I hope this service helps make the
transition to using a Git repository on Salsa smoother and more
convenient for you.

Your package was highlighted in the Bug of the Day[3] initiative, which
aims to introduce newcomers to manageable tasks and guide them through
the workflow to solve them. The focus of this initiative is on migrating
packages to Salsa, as it's a great way to familiarize newcomers with a
consistent Git-based workflow.

Kind regards
    Andreas.

[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#package-salvaging
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/salvage-team/funnelweb
[3] https://salsa.debian.org/tille/tiny_qa_tools/-/wikis/Tiny-QA-tasks



-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.10.4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1212696

Source: funnelweb
Version: 3.2-5
Followup-For: Bug #1080175

There exists a seperate doc.
funnelweb-doc   v3.2d-4.2


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.7
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-25-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1213989 — Bug#1080175: funnelweb (3.2-6) uploaded to DELAYED=10

Hi Yann,

as per ITS bug I have uploaded funnelweb to DELAYED=10 queue.  Please
let me know if you want me to remove this upload before it hits unstable.

Kind regards
     Andreas.

-- 
https://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1213994 — Bug#929866: Bug#1080175: funnelweb (3.2-6) uploaded to DELAYED=10

Hi Andreas,

No objection to the ITS.
BTW I have already wondered if it would not make sense to simply drop this package entirely, given the small popcon score and the fact it is dead upstream.

Best regards,
-- 
Yann

----- Mail original -----
> De: "Andreas Tille" <andreas@an3as.eu>
> À: "Yann Dirson" <dirson@debian.org>, "Package Salvaging Team" <team+salvage@tracker.debian.org>,
> 929866@bugs.debian.org, 1080175@bugs.debian.org
> Envoyé: Dimanche 22 Septembre 2024 22:12:39
> Objet: Bug#1080175: funnelweb (3.2-6) uploaded to DELAYED=10
> 
> Hi Yann,
> 
> as per ITS bug I have uploaded funnelweb to DELAYED=10 queue.  Please
> let me know if you want me to remove this upload before it hits
> unstable.
> 
> Kind regards
>      Andreas.
> 
> --
> https://fam-tille.de
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1214014 — Bug#1080175: funnelweb (3.2-6) uploaded to DELAYED=10

Hi Yann,

Am Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 11:54:17PM +0200 schrieb Yann Dirson:
> No objection to the ITS.

Thanks for confirming.

> BTW I have already wondered if it would not make sense to simply drop this package entirely, given the small popcon score and the fact it is dead upstream.

I admit the same idea came to my mind as well.  However, the Bug of the
Day initiative is also kind of demonstration how to triage bugs and
update packages.  For this purpose the update was fine.  If you prefer
to remove the package from Debian just do so.

Kind regards and thanks for maintaining the package over the years
    Andreas.

-- 
https://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist

csiph-web