Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1189284 > unrolled thread

Bug#1065567: timedatectl does not recognize ntpsec

Started byJeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
First post2024-03-06 19:00 +0100
Last post2024-03-06 19:40 +0100
Articles 2 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

Contents

  Bug#1065567: timedatectl does not recognize ntpsec Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 19:00 +0100
    Bug#1065567: timedatectl does not recognize ntpsec Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 19:40 +0100

#1189284 — Bug#1065567: timedatectl does not recognize ntpsec

FromJeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
Date2024-03-06 19:00 +0100
SubjectBug#1065567: timedatectl does not recognize ntpsec
Message-ID<If3IB-eQKb-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Package: systemd
Version:  255.4-1
Tags: sid

It looks like Systemd's timedatectl does not recognize ntpsec. Using
it results in 'NTP service: n/a':

$ timedatectl
               Local time: Wed 2024-03-06 12:35:32 EST
           Universal time: Wed 2024-03-06 17:35:32 UTC
                 RTC time: Wed 2024-03-06 17:35:32
                Time zone: America/New_York (EST, -0500)
System clock synchronized: yes
              NTP service: n/a
          RTC in local TZ: no

According to <https://wiki.debian.org/DateTime#Installing_NTP>, ntpsec
is an option for Debian 11 and below; and default for Debian 12 and
above.

I searched for an upstream bug at <https://github.com/systemd/systemd>
(is that the right place?), but there were no relevant hits. See
<https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues?q=is%3Aissue+ntpsec>.

Also see <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/03/msg00145.html>.
That's the debian-users mailing list discussion with GW's comment.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1189287

FromJeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
Date2024-03-06 19:40 +0100
Message-ID<If4lj-eRc7-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1189284
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 1:29 PM Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Control: reassign -1 ntpsec
>
> Actually, I think it's better to just reassign the bug report and let
> Richard decide whether he closes it as wontfix or ships such an
> integration snippet.
>
> Richard, if you are interested in shipping such a ntp-units.d snippet
> and you have further questions, please ask.

Thank you sir!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist

csiph-web