Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1189217 > unrolled thread

Bug#1065529: interimap: Testsuite fails with openssl 3.2

Started bySebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
First post2024-03-06 08:10 +0100
Last post2024-03-08 21:00 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist


Contents

  Bug#1065529: interimap: Testsuite fails with openssl 3.2 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2024-03-06 08:10 +0100
    Bug#1065529: interimap: Testsuite fails with openssl 3.2 Guilhem Moulin <guilhem@debian.org> - 2024-03-06 15:40 +0100
      Bug#1065529: interimap: Testsuite fails with openssl 3.2 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2024-03-08 21:00 +0100

#1189217 — Bug#1065529: interimap: Testsuite fails with openssl 3.2

FromSebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Date2024-03-06 08:10 +0100
SubjectBug#1065529: interimap: Testsuite fails with openssl 3.2
Message-ID<IeTzz-eKRB-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Package: interimap
Version: 0.5.7-2
Severity: important
Tags: sid
control: affects -1 src:openssl
User: pkg-openssl-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: openssl-3.2

interimap's testsuite fails with OpenSSL 3.2, which is currently in
experimental, for the tests:

    SSL_CAfile/$SSL_CERT_FILE... FAILED
    TLS servername extension (SNI)... FAILED

Full log at
	https://ci.debian.net/packages/i/interimap/unstable/amd64/43404948/

I'm currently puzzled where to look at. Could you please have a look?

Sebastian

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1189259

FromGuilhem Moulin <guilhem@debian.org>
Date2024-03-06 15:40 +0100
Message-ID<If0B4-eOWK-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1189217

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Sebastian,

Great to hear OpenSSL 3.2 will soon be entering sid! :-)

On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 at 07:59:53 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I'm currently puzzled where to look at. Could you please have a look?

It seems openssl-req(1ssl) now generates X.509 version 3 certificates by
default.  (A new flag `-509v1` was added to revert back to version 1.)

interimap's test suite generates a transient CAs, but didn't pass any
X.509 v3 basic constraints as it assumed v1.  The resulting “CA” was
therefore generated without CA:TRUE thereby failing peer validation.

The fix is trivial, I'll simply change the test suite to generate a v3
CA instead and pass CA:TRUE.  But I thought it might be useful to spell
the fix out in case there are other affected packages.

Cheers,
-- 
Guilhem.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1189482

FromSebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Date2024-03-08 21:00 +0100
Message-ID<IfOxQ-fjA7-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1189259
On 2024-03-06 15:27:50 [+0100], Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi,

> Great to hear OpenSSL 3.2 will soon be entering sid! :-)
> 
> On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 at 07:59:53 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > I'm currently puzzled where to look at. Could you please have a look?
> 
> It seems openssl-req(1ssl) now generates X.509 version 3 certificates by
> default.  (A new flag `-509v1` was added to revert back to version 1.)
> 
> interimap's test suite generates a transient CAs, but didn't pass any
> X.509 v3 basic constraints as it assumed v1.  The resulting “CA” was
> therefore generated without CA:TRUE thereby failing peer validation.
> 
> The fix is trivial, I'll simply change the test suite to generate a v3
> CA instead and pass CA:TRUE.  But I thought it might be useful to spell
> the fix out in case there are other affected packages.

Thank for the explanation.

> Cheers,

Sebastian

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web