Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1200651 > unrolled thread

Bug#1064299: console-setup: move files to /usr (DEP17)

Started byHelmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>
First post2024-06-12 15:40 +0200
Last post2024-07-08 23:40 +0200
Articles 5 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#1064299: console-setup: move files to /usr (DEP17) Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2024-06-12 15:40 +0200
    Bug#1064299: console-setup: move files to /usr (DEP17) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-06-20 09:50 +0200
      Bug#1064299: console-setup: move files to /usr (DEP17) Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2024-06-20 11:10 +0200
        Bug#1064299: console-setup: move files to /usr (DEP17) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-06-20 11:40 +0200
          Bug#1064299: console-setup: move files to /usr (DEP17) Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> - 2024-07-08 23:40 +0200

#1200651 — Bug#1064299: console-setup: move files to /usr (DEP17)

FromHelmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>
Date2024-06-12 15:40 +0200
SubjectBug#1064299: console-setup: move files to /usr (DEP17)
Message-ID<IOwmJ-2okd-9@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 08:13:29PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> We want to finalize the /usr-merge transition by moving all aliased
> files from / to /usr via DEP17 to avoid negative effects arising from
> aliasing. console-setup is involved, because it ships quite a few
> aliased files. I'm sending a patch, because it cannot be automatically
> converted using dh-sequence-movetousr. I note that the Debian installer
> is producing a merged-/usr filesystem since a few months. Also take note
> that this patch must not be uploaded to bookworm-backports or earlier as
> it would violate the file move moratorium there.

I've uploaded a slightly rebased version of the patch to DELAYED/10. Let
me know if I should delay any longer.

Helmut

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1201655

FromCyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Date2024-06-20 09:50 +0200
Message-ID<IRkIp-4exY-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1200651

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> (2024-06-12):
> I've uploaded a slightly rebased version of the patch to DELAYED/10. Let
> me know if I should delay any longer.
> 
> Helmut

> diff -Nru console-setup-1.227/CHANGES console-setup-1.228/CHANGES
> --- console-setup-1.227/CHANGES	2024-05-30 10:54:36.000000000 +0200
> +++ console-setup-1.228/CHANGES	2024-02-18 13:51:52.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> +console-setup (1.228) unstable; urgency=medium
> +
> +  * Non-maintainer upload.
> +  * DEP17: Move aliased files to /usr. (Closes: #1064299)
> +
> + -- Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>  Sun, 18 Feb 2024 13:51:52 +0100

Err, this is not how NMUs are versioned, and the package sitting in
DELAYED led to my RC bugfix's getting trashed.

NMU canceled, MU re-uploaded (matching what's been pushed to git
earlier).


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1201665

FromHelmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>
Date2024-06-20 11:10 +0200
Message-ID<IRlXP-4ftq-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1201655
Hi Cyril,

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 09:44:43AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Err, this is not how NMUs are versioned, and the package sitting in
> DELAYED led to my RC bugfix's getting trashed.

My fault. Not sure how I ended up with that version. I normally use dch
--nmu and it would have done the right thing here.

> NMU canceled, MU re-uploaded (matching what's been pushed to git
> earlier).

Unfortunately, your MU missed the requested changes. Would you prefer me
redoing the NMU (correctly versioned) or uploading it yourself?

Helmut

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1201670

FromCyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Date2024-06-20 11:40 +0200
Message-ID<IRmqS-4fDP-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1201665

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,

Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> (2024-06-20):
> My fault. Not sure how I ended up with that version. I normally use
> dch --nmu and it would have done the right thing here.

OK. And yeah, that's known/verified to work with native packages too.

> > NMU canceled, MU re-uploaded (matching what's been pushed to git
> > earlier).
> 
> Unfortunately, your MU missed the requested changes.

Well, sure, my focus was on an RC bugfix.

> Would you prefer me redoing the NMU (correctly versioned) or uploading
> it yourself?

Ideally someone from debian-boot@ would review/merge/upload those
changes but since that hasn't happened yet, I suppose a NMU would work.

xkeyboard-config's autopkgtest situation doesn't look like it's going to
be a speedy migration to testing, so I'm not sure you need to wait for
1.228 to migrate to testing; going to DELAYED route again might be nice
though, to have a chance for those to migrate to testing first, before
adding DEP-17 changes on top of them?


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1203646

FromHolger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
Date2024-07-08 23:40 +0200
Message-ID<IY4fv-LCT-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1201670
Control: tags -1 + pending


Hi,

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote (Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:32:31 +0200):
> Hi,
> 
> Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> (2024-06-20):
> > My fault. Not sure how I ended up with that version. I normally use
> > dch --nmu and it would have done the right thing here.
> 
> OK. And yeah, that's known/verified to work with native packages too.
> 
> > > NMU canceled, MU re-uploaded (matching what's been pushed to git
> > > earlier).
> > 
> > Unfortunately, your MU missed the requested changes.
> 
> Well, sure, my focus was on an RC bugfix.
> 
> > Would you prefer me redoing the NMU (correctly versioned) or uploading
> > it yourself?
> 
> Ideally someone from debian-boot@ would review/merge/upload those
> changes but since that hasn't happened yet, I suppose a NMU would work.
> 
> xkeyboard-config's autopkgtest situation doesn't look like it's going to
> be a speedy migration to testing, so I'm not sure you need to wait for
> 1.228 to migrate to testing; going to DELAYED route again might be nice
> though, to have a chance for those to migrate to testing first, before
> adding DEP-17 changes on top of them?

I have just applied Helmut's patch (with a small adaption due to the
"No longer build kfreebsd packages" commits) to git.

Intend to wait for 1.229 to migrate to testing, before uploading.


Holger



-- 
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508  3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web