Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1197541 > unrolled thread

Bug#1071161: bullseye-pu: package glib2.0/2.66.8-1+deb11u4

Started bySimon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
First post2024-05-15 12:00 +0200
Last post2024-05-21 18:10 +0200
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist


Contents

  Bug#1071161: bullseye-pu: package glib2.0/2.66.8-1+deb11u4 Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2024-05-15 12:00 +0200
    Bug#1071161: glib2.0 2.66.8-1+deb11u4 flagged for acceptance Adam D Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2024-05-20 22:20 +0200
      Bug#1071161: glib2.0 2.66.8-1+deb11u4 flagged for acceptance Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2024-05-21 12:30 +0200
        Bug#1071161: glib2.0 2.66.8-1+deb11u4 flagged for acceptance "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2024-05-21 18:10 +0200

#1197541 — Bug#1071161: bullseye-pu: package glib2.0/2.66.8-1+deb11u4

FromSimon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Date2024-05-15 12:00 +0200
SubjectBug#1071161: bullseye-pu: package glib2.0/2.66.8-1+deb11u4
Message-ID<IEjAt-duAr-3@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: glib2.0@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:glib2.0

[ Reason ]
Fix a minor memory leak introduced by recent security updates, matching
a similar request for bookworm-pu.

[ Impact ]
In an unusual situation that I believe is very rare in practice, programs
using D-Bus via GLib will leak memory.

[ Tests ]
There is a relatively extensive test suite, which is how the leak was found
in the first place, and it still passes.

I no longer have Debian 11 on real hardware, but I tried the proposed
version briefly in a GNOME virtual machine and it still works.

[ Risks ]
Low risk. The change is small and obviously correct, already migrated
to testing, and was included in the backported security fix for Debian
10 LTS. It was discovered too late to be included with the more serious
regression fixes in Debian 12 and 11, and in any case would not have been
urgent enough to justify delaying fixes for the more serious regression.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
      - this is vs. bullseye-security, I assume that's OK
  [x] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable

[ Changes ]
All changes are for this single bug fix.

[ Other info ]
I already uploaded the proposed version to bullseye-proposed-updates.

The security team did not consider this to be important enough to issue
another DSA update.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198098 — Bug#1071161: glib2.0 2.66.8-1+deb11u4 flagged for acceptance

FromAdam D Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date2024-05-20 22:20 +0200
SubjectBug#1071161: glib2.0 2.66.8-1+deb11u4 flagged for acceptance
Message-ID<IGhEd-eHpz-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1197541
package release.debian.org
tags 1071161 = bullseye pending
thanks

Hi,

The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.

Thanks for your contribution!

Upload details
==============

Package: glib2.0
Version: 2.66.8-1+deb11u4

Explanation: fix a (rare) memory leak

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198156 — Bug#1071161: glib2.0 2.66.8-1+deb11u4 flagged for acceptance

FromSimon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Date2024-05-21 12:30 +0200
SubjectBug#1071161: glib2.0 2.66.8-1+deb11u4 flagged for acceptance
Message-ID<IGuUN-ePsr-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198098
On Mon, 20 May 2024 at 20:12:24 +0000, Adam D Barratt wrote:
> The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance
> into the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
...
> Package: glib2.0
> Version: 2.66.8-1+deb11u4
> Explanation: fix a (rare) memory leak

Thanks for reviewing this change. Please consider also accepting #1071159
into bookworm-p-u (same change, different base version) to preserve the
property that bookworm has no regressions when compared with bullseye,
which I assume is something we want to be able to treat as an invariant.

    smcv

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198193 — Bug#1071161: glib2.0 2.66.8-1+deb11u4 flagged for acceptance

From"Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date2024-05-21 18:10 +0200
SubjectBug#1071161: glib2.0 2.66.8-1+deb11u4 flagged for acceptance
Message-ID<IGAdP-eSJA-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198156
On Tue, 2024-05-21 at 11:23 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2024 at 20:12:24 +0000, Adam D Barratt wrote:
> > The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for
> > acceptance
> > into the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
> ...
> > Package: glib2.0
> > Version: 2.66.8-1+deb11u4
> > Explanation: fix a (rare) memory leak
> 
> Thanks for reviewing this change. Please consider also accepting
> #1071159 into bookworm-p-u (same change, different base version) to
> preserve the property that bookworm has no regressions when compared
> with bullseye, which I assume is something we want to be able to
> treat as an invariant.

Yep, that's the plan. I just ran out of time on yesterday's run through
the queues before I got to handling the bookworm upload.

Regards,

Adam

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web