Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1197798 > unrolled thread

Bug#1071362: rpy2: FTBFS: rpy2/tests/rinterface/test_embedded_r.py s.......Fatal Python error: Segmentation fault

Started byDirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
First post2024-05-17 23:00 +0200
Last post2024-05-26 14:40 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#1071362: rpy2: FTBFS: rpy2/tests/rinterface/test_embedded_r.py s.......Fatal Python error: Segmentation fault Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> - 2024-05-17 23:00 +0200
    Bug#1071362: rpy2: FTBFS: rpy2/tests/rinterface/test_embedded_r.py s.......Fatal Python error: Segmentation fault Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> - 2024-05-18 13:50 +0200
      Bug#1071362: rpy2: FTBFS: rpy2/tests/rinterface/test_embedded_r.py s.......Fatal Python error: Segmentation fault Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com> - 2024-05-25 06:40 +0200
        Bug#1071362: rpy2: FTBFS: rpy2/tests/rinterface/test_embedded_r.py s.......Fatal Python error: Segmentation fault Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> - 2024-05-26 14:40 +0200

#1197798 — Bug#1071362: rpy2: FTBFS: rpy2/tests/rinterface/test_embedded_r.py s.......Fatal Python error: Segmentation fault

FromDirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Date2024-05-17 23:00 +0200
SubjectBug#1071362: rpy2: FTBFS: rpy2/tests/rinterface/test_embedded_r.py s.......Fatal Python error: Segmentation fault
Message-ID<IFcQh-e2a2-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Is there a chance this could be spurious?  The R API is reasonably stable,
including the part for embedding R (and I am upstream for a small project
doing that from C++).  rpy2 is also mature and stable.  So could this be a
one-off?

Dirk

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1197847

FromDirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Date2024-05-18 13:50 +0200
Message-ID<IFqJz-ebdU-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1197798
On 17 May 2024 at 23:05, Santiago Vila wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Is there a chance this could be spurious?
| 
| Unlikely because it also happens here:
| 
| https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/rpy2.html

Ok, I will get in touch with Laurent.

Dirk
 
| Thanks.

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198518

FromBo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com>
Date2024-05-25 06:40 +0200
Message-ID<IHRmh-fElD-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1197847

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 06:41:53AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>On 17 May 2024 at 23:05, Santiago Vila wrote:
>| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>| > Is there a chance this could be spurious?
>|
>| Unlikely because it also happens here:
>|
>| https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/rpy2.html
>
>Ok, I will get in touch with Laurent.

hmm, the failure will not happen on riscv64 real hardware when I am
trying to get below diff file.

-- 
Regards,
--
   Bo YU

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198720

FromDirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Date2024-05-26 14:40 +0200
Message-ID<IIlkm-fY5K-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198518
On 25 May 2024 at 12:35, Bo YU wrote:
| Hi,
| On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 06:41:53AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| >On 17 May 2024 at 23:05, Santiago Vila wrote:
| >| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >| > Is there a chance this could be spurious?
| >|
| >| Unlikely because it also happens here:
| >|
| >| https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/rpy2.html
| >
| >Ok, I will get in touch with Laurent.
| 
| hmm, the failure will not happen on riscv64 real hardware when I am
| trying to get below diff file.

Thanks for working through this, and a good idea to piggy-back on the
existing test skipping for mips64!  The only thing that is a little troubling
the overall skip of the 'datetime from timestamp' test but we probably added
that one for a reason too...

I think I will apply this.  Many thanks!

Dirk
 
| -- 
| Regards,
| --
|    Bo YU
| 
| x[DELETED ATTACHMENT rpy2_fix_ftbfs_riscv64.debdiff, plain text]
| x[DELETED ATTACHMENT signature.asc, application/pgp-signature]

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web