Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1194442 > unrolled thread

Bug#1061421: Fails to start after an upgrade

Started byJeremy Bícha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com>
First post2024-04-17 20:50 +0200
Last post2024-05-17 20:40 +0200
Articles 5 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#1061421: Fails to start after an upgrade Jeremy Bícha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com> - 2024-04-17 20:50 +0200
    Bug#1061421: Fails to start after an upgrade Jeremy Bícha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com> - 2024-04-21 17:50 +0200
      Bug#1061421: Fails to start after an upgrade Marc Dequènes (duck) <duck@duckcorp.org> - 2024-05-08 03:00 +0200
        Bug#1061421: Fails to start after an upgrade Marc Dequènes (duck) <duck@duckcorp.org> - 2024-05-08 11:40 +0200
          Bug#1061421: Fails to start after an upgrade Ryan Kavanagh <rak@debian.org> - 2024-05-17 20:40 +0200

#1194442 — Bug#1061421: Fails to start after an upgrade

FromJeremy Bícha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com>
Date2024-04-17 20:50 +0200
SubjectBug#1061421: Fails to start after an upgrade
Message-ID<Iuiw2-6WWR-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Control: tags +moreinfo

Please verify whether wlgreet is working for you now.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1194926

FromJeremy Bícha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com>
Date2024-04-21 17:50 +0200
Message-ID<IvHC1-7Tu9-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1194442
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 2:36 AM Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Jeremy Bícha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com> writes:
> > Please verify whether wlgreet is working for you now.
>
> Was something changed somewhere? What, where?
>
> On trixie the issue reproduces exactly the same (even with sway upgraded
> to the binNMU'd version from sid).

There have been a huge amount of changes, but most of those changes
were in Unstable and haven't reached Testing yet.

Marc, there is a fix for sway 1.9 in wlgreet 0.5. Do you want to try
if that improves anything here?

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1196800

FromMarc Dequènes (duck) <duck@duckcorp.org>
Date2024-05-08 03:00 +0200
Message-ID<IBDP4-bOHy-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1194926
Quack,

On 2024-04-22 00:44, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> There have been a huge amount of changes, but most of those changes
> were in Unstable and haven't reached Testing yet.

I can confirm the problem is still there in latest unstable.

> Marc, there is a fix for sway 1.9 in wlgreet 0.5. Do you want to try
> if that improves anything here?

Not sure this is the same problem but I would say it's worth a try.
I'll prepare the package and let you know how it goes.

Regards.
\_o<

-- 
Marc Dequènes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1196827

FromMarc Dequènes (duck) <duck@duckcorp.org>
Date2024-05-08 11:40 +0200
Message-ID<IBLWh-bTPO-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1196800
Quack,

On 2024-05-08 09:40, Marc Dequènes wrote:

> Not sure this is the same problem but I would say it's worth a try.
> I'll prepare the package and let you know how it goes.

I packaged and uploaded 0.5.0 and this bug is fixed for me now, but I'd 
like to hear from you all before closing this bug.

I'm still not sure 0.5.0 fixes this bug and I do not have time to 
explore all possibilities. As Peter found in #1065506 building with 
newer wayland and smithay versions can cause problems because there's 
important changes in newer versions and that may be the real source of 
this problem. Until upstream works on bumping the deps they are now 
locked. It's annoying to keep multiple versions around but there's no 
way around it at the moment.

I'm using greetd 0.10.0 as upstream bumped the requirement for the 
greetd_ipc component. I don't think that's necessary to have such 
combination according to what changed in 0.10 and I left the link 
between both packages loose as before. Tell me if you encounter any 
problem.

Regards.
\_o<

-- 
Marc Dequènes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1197765

FromRyan Kavanagh <rak@debian.org>
Date2024-05-17 20:40 +0200
Message-ID<IFaEO-e0S8-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1196827

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 06:32:03PM +0900, Marc Dequènes wrote:
> I packaged and uploaded 0.5.0 and this bug is fixed for me now, but
> I'd like to hear from you all before closing this bug.

The bug is also fixed for me with 0.5.0-1. Thanks for getting this
fixed!

Best wishes,
Ryan

-- 
|)|/  Ryan Kavanagh  | 4E46 9519 ED67 7734 268F
|\|\  https://rak.ac | BD95 8F7B F8FC 4A11 C97A

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web