Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1174506 > unrolled thread

Bug#1055751: transition: wolfssl

Started byBastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
First post2023-11-10 16:10 +0100
Last post2023-11-10 22:40 +0100
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist


Contents

  Bug#1055751: transition: wolfssl Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2023-11-10 16:10 +0100
    Bug#1055751: transition: wolfssl Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2023-11-10 18:10 +0100
      Bug#1055751: transition: wolfssl Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2023-11-10 19:20 +0100
        Bug#1055751: transition: wolfssl Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2023-11-10 22:40 +0100

#1174506 — Bug#1055751: transition: wolfssl

FromBastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Date2023-11-10 16:10 +0100
SubjectBug#1055751: transition: wolfssl
Message-ID<HyBiV-4tAN-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 wolfssl
X-Debbugs-Cc: wolfssl@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wolfssl.html

wolfssl is available in experimental with libwolfssl41.
This transition is from libwolfssl35.
The auto-generated Ben file is okay and all reverse dependencies build fine.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1174515

FromSebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
Date2023-11-10 18:10 +0100
Message-ID<HyDb3-4uHv-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1174506
Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On 2023-11-10 15:57:27 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 wolfssl
> X-Debbugs-Cc: wolfssl@packages.debian.org
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Severity: normal
> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wolfssl.html
> 
> wolfssl is available in experimental with libwolfssl41.
> This transition is from libwolfssl35.
> The auto-generated Ben file is okay and all reverse dependencies build fine.

What's the status of the reverse dependencies? Do they build
successfully with the new version of wolfssl?

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1174522

FromBastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Date2023-11-10 19:20 +0100
Message-ID<HyEgN-4vim-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1174515
Am 10.11.23 um 18:03 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> On 2023-11-10 15:57:27 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
>> The auto-generated Ben file is okay and all reverse dependencies build fine.
> 
> What's the status of the reverse dependencies? Do they build
> successfully with the new version of wolfssl?

Yes, as I have written.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1174543

FromSebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
Date2023-11-10 22:40 +0100
Message-ID<HyHol-4x2g-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1174522
Control: tags -1 = confirmed

On 2023-11-10 19:13:22 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Am 10.11.23 um 18:03 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > 
> > On 2023-11-10 15:57:27 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> > > The auto-generated Ben file is okay and all reverse dependencies build fine.
> > 
> > What's the status of the reverse dependencies? Do they build
> > successfully with the new version of wolfssl?
> 
> Yes, as I have written.

I should have finished with reading that sentence. Please go ahead.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web