Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1171467 > unrolled thread
| Started by | sergio <sazamoracl@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-10-12 00:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2023-10-18 22:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1037029: spyder: Saving files window does not respect current active Gnome dark mode sergio <sazamoracl@gmail.com> - 2023-10-12 00:10 +0200
Bug#1037029: spyder: Saving files window does not respect current active Gnome dark mode Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2023-10-12 12:20 +0200
Bug#1037029: spyder: Saving files window does not respect current active Gnome dark mode sergio <sazamoracl@gmail.com> - 2023-10-18 22:50 +0200
| From | sergio <sazamoracl@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-10-12 00:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1037029: spyder: Saving files window does not respect current active Gnome dark mode |
| Message-ID | <HnPyV-fbxk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
El jue, 17 de ago de 2023 a las 11:36:58 AM, Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> escribió: > spyder Hi Julian, any way of doing this from the stable release ? I've installed from testing some very, very minimal/specific packages before, but looks like this is going to update some other packages on stable release. Any possible arrive to backports repository in the near future ? Thank you for time Regards. Sergio
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-10-12 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Ho0Xn-fin6-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1171467 |
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 06:56:02PM -0300, sergio wrote: > El jue, 17 de ago de 2023 a las 11:36:58 AM, Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> > escribi > > spyder > > Hi Julian, > any way of doing this from the stable release ? I've installed from testing some > very, very minimal/specific packages before, but looks like this is going to > update some other packages on stable release. Any possible arrive to backports > repository in the near future ? > Thank you for time > Regards. > Sergio Hi Sergio, As you say, spyder has a lot of dependencies, and I don't know exactly which ones would need backporting to get a working spyder in backports, and how many of these backports might break other things in other packages along the way. I don't have the capacity to take on this level of responsibility for backports, so I do not intend to backport spyder. If someone else would like to take on this task, though, they are more than welcome to do so! (If this bug is really annoying you, you can always run the PyPI version of spyder in a virtual environment.) Best wishes, Julian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sergio <sazamoracl@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-10-18 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <HqlEm-gO20-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1171516 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi Julian, thank you for the answer and explanation. Best regards, Sergio Zamora Molffe Analista Programador Computacional El jue, 12 de oct de 2023 a las 10:54:55 AM, Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> escribió: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 06:56:02PM -0300, sergio wrote: >> El jue, 17 de ago de 2023 a las 11:36:58 AM, Julian Gilbey >> <julian@d-and-j.net <mailto:julian@d-and-j.net>> >> escribi >> >> spyder >> >> Hi Julian, >> any way of doing this from the stable release ? I've installed from >> testing some >> very, very minimal/specific packages before, but looks like this is >> going to >> update some other packages on stable release. Any possible arrive >> to backports >> repository in the near future ? >> Thank you for time >> Regards. >> Sergio > > Hi Sergio, > > As you say, spyder has a lot of dependencies, and I don't know exactly > which ones would need backporting to get a working spyder in > backports, and how many of these backports might break other things in > other packages along the way. I don't have the capacity to take on > this level of responsibility for backports, so I do not intend to > backport spyder. > > If someone else would like to take on this task, though, they are more > than welcome to do so! > > (If this bug is really annoying you, you can always run the PyPI > version of spyder in a virtual environment.) > > Best wishes, > > Julian
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web