Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1179489 > unrolled thread

Bug#1059134: RM: dpdk-kmods [i386] -- ROM; architecture support removed

Started byLuca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
First post2023-12-20 12:20 +0100
Last post2023-12-20 17:00 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist


Contents

  Bug#1059134: RM: dpdk-kmods [i386] -- ROM; architecture support removed Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-12-20 12:20 +0100
    Bug#1059134: RM: dpdk-kmods [i386] -- ROM; architecture support removed Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2023-12-20 14:50 +0100
      Bug#1059134: RM: dpdk-kmods [i386] -- ROM; architecture support removed Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-12-20 17:00 +0100

#1179489 — Bug#1059134: RM: dpdk-kmods [i386] -- ROM; architecture support removed

FromLuca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Date2023-12-20 12:20 +0100
SubjectBug#1059134: RM: dpdk-kmods [i386] -- ROM; architecture support removed
Message-ID<HN2Mh-eQqR-11@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-dpdk-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Please remove the i386 build of src:dpdk-kmods from Debian Testing and
Unstable. The new src:dpdk 23.11-1 version, just uploaded to unstable,
no longer builds for this architecture, so we don't need the ancillary
kernel modules either.

Thank you!

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1179505

FromBastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Date2023-12-20 14:50 +0100
Message-ID<HN57r-eS3j-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1179489
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 12:13:09PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Please remove the i386 build of src:dpdk-kmods from Debian Testing and
> Unstable. The new src:dpdk 23.11-1 version, just uploaded to unstable,
> no longer builds for this architecture, so we don't need the ancillary
> kernel modules either.

Why is this package not arch-all?

Bastian

-- 
Well, Jim, I'm not much of an actor either.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1179520

FromLuca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Date2023-12-20 17:00 +0100
Message-ID<HN79f-eTir-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1179505
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 14:51, Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 12:13:09PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Please remove the i386 build of src:dpdk-kmods from Debian Testing and
> > Unstable. The new src:dpdk 23.11-1 version, just uploaded to unstable,
> > no longer builds for this architecture, so we don't need the ancillary
> > kernel modules either.
>
> Why is this package not arch-all?
>
> Bastian

Not sure there was a specific reason, I guess we want to restrict it
to only supported architectures

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web